University of Dayton: Fall 2008
Course Number: MUS-385 (3 credits)
Title: Music Therapy Principles
Instructor: James Hiller, MMT, MT-BC
Office/Phone: Music Building: Rm 107 937-229-3985
eMail: james.hiller@notes.udayton.edu
Days/Times: T-Th 9:00-10:15am
Room Number: Art Street, Studio B
Cluster/Gen
| Course Overview | Tentative Schedule |
| Requirements | Grading |
| MUS385 Classroom Policies & Professional Communication | Music Therapy Program Policies for Successful Learning |
| Texts |
In Unit #1, we will survey a sampling of theoretical writings to elucidate principles, orientations, and standards (clinical and ethical) guiding music therapy practice and research. Through group discussions, student presentations, and lectures we will examine how each theory addresses the dynamics and processes of therapeutic relationships, perspectives on music and healing, the role of music in therapy, clients' potentials and limitations in the therapy process, and the therapist's role in the therapy process. Students will be challenged to relate her/his own current and past clinical experiences to theoretical constructs under scrutiny. We will also include short demonstration and role play situations in class. From the readings and discussions, students will develop and clearly articulate in writing a personal philosophy of music therapy. Students will also present their philosophy via a Power Point presentation.
In Unit #2, we will perform an overview of the American Music Therapy Association (AMTA) and Certification Board for Music Therapists (CBMT) and examine current issues in the development and evolution of the field. Students will review and discuss content from the AMTA Code of Ethics, AMTA Standards of Clinical Practice, and the CBMT Scope of Practice. An ethical problem solving model will be presented along with in-class exercises. Samples from the CBMT Board Certification Self-Assessment Examination will be presented to provide students with exposure to the examination format as well as the processes through which the examination was developed and is currently maintained.
Bruscia, K. (1999). Defining Music Therapy, 2nd Edition. Phoenixville, PA: Barcelona Publishers.
Bruscia, K. (Ed.) (1991). Case Studies in Music Therapy. Phoenixville, PA: Barcelona Publishers.
Darrow, A. (2004). Introduction to Approaches in Music Therapy. Silver Spring, MD: American Music Therapy Association, Inc.
**The instructor will provide a course pack of readings. Students must reimburse the Music Dept. the copying fee for these documents.
Articles from the music therapy journals may be found on the second floor of Roushe Library and/or on the AMTA CD ROM**.
ALSO, students are strongly encouraged to purchase the CD-ROM, "Music Therapy Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Foundations, CD-ROM, 2nd Edition, 1964 - 2003" from the American Music Therapy Association (Student price is approximately $60.00). The AMTA web site may be accessed through the following URL: www.musictherapy.org
Students have the responsibility for remaining current on all the assigned readings throughout the semester. Preparation is essential to successful learning in this course as the in-class discussions will be derived from the daily readings.
Active participation during each and every class time is expected and will be critically examined for grading purposes. Evaluation of participation will occur daily.
Students will be responsible for reading and analyzing theoretical writings. Students will fill out a Theory Analysis Form for each theory. These forms will be permitted during the Final Exam and/or Final Project and should therefore be maintained as completely and accurately as possible. The instructor may randomly collect the analysis forms during the semester for evaluation of students' work.
Students may be assigned to lead and participate in individual or group music therapy experiences that incorporate concepts from various theoretical standpoints. When such assignments occur, short reflection papers on the experience will be assigned.
Students will regularly complete in-class writing assignments. These assignments are not graded but are used to facilitate critical thought regarding particular topics relevant to the course.
Students will develop and articulate a Personal Philosophy of Music Therapy from guidelines provided in class and develop and present a Power Point presentation for the class and perhaps for other music therapy majors and professors.
There will be Quiz over material from Unit #2, a take-home Midterm, and a comprehensive Final Exam.
NOTE: As per AMTA guidelines, students must earn a C- or better in this course in order to be recommended for internship.
Preparation and Participation (20 pts per half term) 40 pts
Unit 1: MidTerm take-home exam on theoretical concepts 20 pts
TBA assignment 25 pts
Theoretical Article Synopses Portfolio 20 pts
Personal Philosophy of Music Therapy document 30 pts
Power Point & In Class Presentation 10 pts
Unit 2: Quiz over AMTA and CBMT professional organizations and ethical problem solving. 20 pts
Final Examination (cumulative) 35 pts
TOTAL 200 pts
Written Assignments
*The following rubric lists the possible areas of evaluation for written assignments. Please use APA format when appropriate.
|
Written Assignment Rubric |
|
FACTUAL
BASIS: |
|
1.
Is the response appropriate to the assignment? |
|
2.
Does the paper demonstrate an adequate knowledge of the subject? |
|
3.
Is the reasoning clear and correct? |
|
4.
Do sufficient details, examples, or other data support any
general statements? |
|
5.
Is appropriate credit given for the use of any written work of
others? |
|
|
|
ORGANIZATION: |
|
1.
Is the central idea, thesis, or proposition clearly stated? |
|
2.
Are all of the other ideas clearly related to the central idea? |
|
a.
Has the paper made clear all the connections between ideas? |
|
b.
Has the paper made clear the connections between the evidence
presented and the ideas
it supports? |
|
3.
Are the ideas in a logical order? |
|
4.
Are the ideas developed in order of their importance? |
|
|
|
MECHANICS
AND USAGE: |
|
1.
Is the vocabulary standard to written English? |
|
2.
Is each sentence complete, clear, and grammatically correct? |
|
3.
Is the punctuation standard? |
|
4.
Is the spelling correct? |
Grading for written assignments will be adversely affected by lateness. Written assignments turned in one day late with the instructor's permission will receive a 10% reduction or a full grade reduction. Written assignments handed in late without instructor's permission will not be accepted and will receive zero points for the assignment.
Course Grading Scale:
|
A |
192-200 |
C+ |
152-159 |
|
A- |
184-191 |
C |
144-151 |
|
B+ |
176-183 |
C- |
136-143 |
|
B |
168-175 |
D |
128-135 |
|
B- |
160-167 |
F |
127 and below |
eMail Attachments Policies: All email attachments must be labeled appropriately in order to receive full credit. Follow the examples below:
Subject Line: use the general label for the project being handed in:
e.g., Case 36 Summary Schizophrenia Video Reflection
Attachment Label : (1) Student name, (2) type of document, and (3) due date:
e.g., Hiller-CASE-BOONE-1-17-07 Smith-VID-MRDD-2-11-07
Attendance
is expected at each class session unless prior
approval is obtained from the instructor. If for any reason you must miss class,
it is your responsibility to notify the instructor prior to the start of the
class session via telephone or email. More than two unexcused or unaccounted for
absences will result in a lowered final grade at the discretion of the
instructor. Incomplete grades may
be granted at the professor’s prerogative; withdrawals are permitted according
to university policy.
Preparation
for each class is expected and will be evaluated
by the instructor according to your participation in topical discussions and
your thorough, accurate, and timely completion of reading, written, and in-class
assignments.
Participation
in class is imperative for the acquisition of
knowledge and development of skills. As
such, participation will be evaluated by the instructor toward assignment of the
final grade. Participation means
active engagement* in class discussions and music experiences, meaningful
contributions to a positive learning environment, and honest engagement in
evaluating and providing feedback to peers.
It may not always be possible for you to have input in each and every
classroom discussion; however patterns of a lack of engagement and input are
recognizable and will be considered in evaluating each student’s level of
engagement in the learning process.
(*“Engage”: to involve oneself or become occupied. Alert (awake!), attentive affect (eye contact and visual tracking- affirmative or doubtful gestures), taking notes, offering feedback, ideas, or thoughts during class discussions, asking questions, offering thoughtful responses to questions or comments from instructor or peers.)
With the rigors of a
health/mental health profession course of study, it is imperative that students
and instructors establish clear, consistent, and respectful communication both
inside and outside of the classroom. Healthy
communication facilitates student-teacher relationships and provides for
learning and growth by providing time and means for 1) brainstorming and problem
solving, 2) planning and evaluating clinical and academic work, 3) academic
advising, and 4) personal support. Communication
also helps to safeguard that clients receive the best services possible.
Please note your professor’s office location, office phone number, and
email address found in each syllabus or on the professor’s web site.
In that the University of Dayton provides all students with a Lotus Notes email account for the purposes of facilitating communication between students and UD officials/professors, your Lotus Notes account will be the address for ALL email communication between you and your music therapy instructors. As such, you must schedule time daily to check your Lotus Notes email account for possible electronic communications regarding this course and other important information related to your study. (It is strongly recommended that you check this account more than once daily.) Students are responsible for information sent via email to your Lotus Notes account. Transfer and part-time students who do not have a Lotus Notes account should make arrangements with the instructor for facilitating electronic communication.
IMPORTANT: all music therapy majors are responsible for the information found at the following link: University of Dayton Music Therapy Program Policies for Successful Learning
This course schedule is subject to change at the instructor's prerogative. Notice will be given to students via email and/or in-class.
| Date |
Content |
Theorist/Author/Topic |
Readings/Assignments |
|
Aug. 21 |
Introduction to the Course | What theory? Why Theory? (PowerPoint) | In-class writing: Beliefs about music and therapy |
| 26 |
UNIT #1: Theoretical Principles of Music Therapy |
"Theory" defined (vs. philosophy) Analyzing Theory |
Defining Research and Theory, Bruscia "Defining" Ch. 24 - Models of Theory Development: i.e., how are theories created and what purposes do they serve for music therapy? |
| 28 | Overview of established theoretical models from outside of music therapy (i.e., psychology): Psychodynamic, Cognitive, Behavioral, Humanistic-Existential, Neurologic/Biomedical, Wellness/Healing |
Major Theories from Psychology
|
Scovel and Gardstrom (2002). Music Therapy Within the Context of
Psychotherapeutic Models. In Unkefer & Thaut, Ed.s (2002).
|
|
Sept. 2 |
In Class Explorations: How do procedures from established theoretical models translate to music therapy practice? | ||
|
4 |
In Class Explorations: How do procedures from established theoretical models translate to music therapy practice? | ||
| 9 | Man and Music |
E. Thayer Gaston "Fundamental considerations of man in relation to music" (anthropology/sociology/psychology) |
In Gaston, E.T. (1968) p. 7-27 (Handout) |
| 11 | Processes in MTx | William Sears: The Roots of Music Therapy Theory | Sears, W. in Gaston (1968) p. 30-46 (Handout) |
| 16 |
Creative Music Therapy (CMT/NRMT) |
Paul Nordoff & Clive Robbins (Ken Aigen) Fundamentals of the Model |
Bruscia, Improvisation Book- Ch.1 & 4 Case Study #4 (Robbins & Robbins) in Bruscia Case Studies |
| 18 |
|
"Old Self/New Self"“Meeting the Music Child” |
|
|
23 |
"How do you do, Walker?" N&R wrap-up |
Aigen, K. (1998). Paths of development in Nordoff-Robbins music therapy. (Handout) "Walker: Genesis of the Music Child"- with listening excerpts from Paths of Development | |
|
25 |
Developmental Foundations for Music Therapy |
Kenneth Bruscia, Human development as it relates to music and musical processes |
Musical Origins: Developmental Foundations for Therapy Janice Dvorkin, Case Study #17: Project- align Dvorkin's case material with Bruscia's description of Human Development Theory in Music |
| 30 | |||
|
Oct. 2 |
Catch-up Day | ||
|
7 |
Behavioral Music Therapy |
Standley, J., Johnson, C., Robb, S., Brownell, M., & Kim, S. (2004). Behavioral Approach to Music Therapy. In Darrow, A (Ed.) (2004) Introduction to approaches in music therapy. Silver Spring, MD: AMTA, Inc. |
|
|
9 |
NO CLASS- MidTerm Break | ||
|
14 |
Neurologic Music Therapy (NMT) |
Michael Thaut A model based on behaviorism, but not a theory |
Claire, A. & Pasiali, V. (2004). Neurologic
Music Therapy. In Darrow, A (Ed.) (2004) Introduction to approaches in
music therapy. Silver Spring, MD: AMTA, Inc. Begin Drafting Personal Philosophy of Music Tx to be presented via written paper & as a Power Point presentation. For assistance, please email rough drafts to Prof Hiller until Oct. 25. MidTerm Papers DUE |
|
16 |
Guided Imagery and Music (GIM) | Helen Bonny |
Burns, D. & Woolrich, J. (2004). The Bonny Method of Guided Imagery and
Music. In Darrow, A (Ed.) (2004)
Introduction to approaches in music therapy. Silver Spring, MD: AMTA,
Inc. Bonny, H. L. (1989). Sound as symbol: Guided Imagery and music in clinical practice. Music Therapy Perspectives, 6, 7-10. |
|
21 |
Bonny, H. (1994). Twenty-One Years Later: A GIM Update. Music Therapy Perspectives, 12(2), 70-74. | ||
|
23 |
|||
|
28 |
Synthesizing Theories | ||
|
30 |
Catch-up Day | ||
|
Nov. 4 |
|||
|
6 |
UNIT 2: Your Professional Organizations AND Ethics in Music Therapy AMTA Standards of Professional Practice, Code of Ethics, and CBMT Scope of Practice. |
Current Professional Issues: Class Discussion The professional organizations for music therapy: Foundations, purposes, functions, and opportunities for volunteerism within the profession. |
2006 Annual Report, etc.
Visit AMTA and CBMT web sites: www.musictherapy.org and www.cbmt.org Locate, download, print, and READ (1) AMTA Code of Ethics, (2) AMTA Standards of Clinical Practice, (3) CBMT Scope of Practice ("Detailed Content Outline"). Place these documents in a binder and bring them to class. (*If you haven't already done so, also place a copy of the AMTA Professional Competencies in your binder.) |
|
11 |
|||
|
13 |
Personal Philosophy of Music Therapy |
DUE: Personal Philosophy of Music Therapy
Papers Present your theoretical/philosophical stances to the class via Power Point and lead a discussion. |
|
|
18 |
|||
|
20 |
NO CLASS |
AMTA ANNUAL CONFERENCE:
Louisville, KY |
|
|
25 |
CBMT: The Board Certification Exam | What is the exam? What does it test? How was it developed? How is it maintained? What does it look like? |
www.cbmt.org
|
|
27 |
NO CLASS: Thanksgiving | ||
|
Dec. 2 |
Ethical Problem Solving | Ethics in Music Therapy |
AMTA Code of Ethics Cheryl Dileo, PhD, MT-BC: Ethical Problem Solving Model (handout) |
| 4 | Hypothetical situations for discussion and in-class exercises | ||
| 9 | LAST CLASS | ||
| 13 | Final Exam: 2:30-4:2s0pm | Comprehensive |