|
ETHICAL DIMENSIONS OF MANAGEMENT Summer, 2009 |
|
Lawrence.Ulrich@notes.udayton.edu |
|
COLLABORATIVE WRITING PROJECT [JUNE 22- LAST DAY TO CONTRIBUTE TO THREADED DISCUSSION]
[JULY 19-LAST DAY TO MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT THE COMPOSITION OF THE FINAL REPORT] [JULY 22- LAST DAY TO CONTRIBUTE TO THREADED DISCUSSION] |
THE TASKS:
[CWP1: An exercise examining the case of Enron --- page 318 in the textbook and Week 8 on the Readings Assignments webpage.]
Imagine that you have been asked by the Board of Directors of your company to bring them up to speed on ENRON. They know that you have probably talked about this case for several years in a variety of courses. But they would like to see a disciplined ETHICAL ANALYSIS of the case. They are particularly interested in the case since Jeff Skilling is in prison and Ken Lay escaped punishment by dying. They want to emphasize the ethical issues in the situation so they can avoid mistakes that Enron's management made. They know that you have taken this course in SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICAL DIMENSIONS OF MANAGEMENT so they expect you to give a carefully argued presentation and analysis. They do not want the presentations and analyses to be too long --- about 2500 words would be quite sufficient; they do not want a lengthy tome --- their time is very valuable and they do not have the time to read an excessively long treatise.
If you CLICK HERE you will find an outline that you are to follow in writing your report. You know how bureaucracies are about giving and following directions.
You will be working as a team with representatives of other corporations around the country. Unfortunately, your other tasks and travels make it impossible for your teams to get together in a room for any length of time so you have to do most of your work over the Internet. Fortunately, QuickPlace offers you the ideal tool to develop team presentations. You will notice that this project combines the features of a threaded discussion and the task of writing. The threaded discussion that leads up to the actual writing should contain at least 5 contributions from each member of the team. These contributions should have substantive content. There may be, in addition, some contributions about how you are going to go about writing the report. The merits of the report will be judged on the team discussion and the reflection of that discussion in the final report.
[CWP2] The task will focus on "The Development of a Corporate Ethics Program for a Corporation in a Global Business Environment." Readings for this assignment will be found in Chapters 7, 8, 9 and 10 of the textbook. More details describing the project will be found on the Instruction page of the Quickplace tool for CWP2. The expectations in terms of length and dynamics for discussing the topic and producing the Final Report will remain as outlined below.
You will be working as a team with representatives of other departments in your company --- you are a global institution. Unfortunately, your other tasks and travels make it impossible for your teams to get together in a room for any length of time so you have to do most of your work over the Internet. Fortunately, QuickPlace offers you the ideal tool to develop team presentations. You will notice that this project combines the features of a threaded discussion and the task of writing. The threaded discussion that leads up to the actual writing should contain at least 5 contributions from each member of the team. These contributions should have substantive content. There may be, in addition, some contributions about how you are going to go about writing the report. The merits of the report will be judged on the team discussion and the reflection of that discussion in the final report.
| QUICKPLACE NOW USES YOUR LDAP USERNAME AND PASSWORD. THE LDAP USERNAME MAY BE THE SAME AS THE USERNAME FOR LOTUS NOTES. HOWEVER, THE PASSWORD FOR LDAP MAY BE DIFFERENT. IF YOU NEED HELP IN REMEMBERING THEM, CALL THE HELP DESK AT 229-3888. |
Since the issues in this matter are so current you will have to use news magazines and newspapers for your research. I suggest Time and Newsweek and also The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. You probably all get The Wall Street Journal so you can go to WSJ.com as an easy resource. You can also take advantage of the Dow Jones Interactive website, <http://www.sba.udayton.edu/it/dji.asp>, which the School of Business Administration makes available to you. The link to the Dow Jones Interactive website is accessed form the SBA link identified above, but you will probably have to use a computer at the university to access this site. Much good and accurate information is available from these sources. The library at this site is a particularly valuable treasure trove of references.
[CWP1] is due by midnight on Sunday, June 28 with the last day for making contributions to the Threaded Discussion, which precedes the writing of the report, being June 22.
[CWP2] is due by midnight on Wednesday, July 29, with the last day for making decisions about the composition of the Final Report Sunday, July 19, and with the last day for making contributions to the Threaded Discussion, which precedes the writing of the report, being July 22.
1. Go to: http://quickplace.udayton.edu/QuickPlace/mba652_ulrich/Main.nsf 2. Click on your "Team and number." [Team members are identified at the
bottom of this page.] 8. If you receive a prompt about allowing secure or nonsecure items, click on "Yes" to allow nonsecure items. |
![]() |
| The above directions will work well for making comments as you begin
to work with the articles.
1. When your team is ready to work on a draft click on "Draft of . . . and number" on the left of your screen. Anyone can make a revision in a draft --- just click on the title of the draft and then "new revision" at the top of the page, enter the revision and then click on "publish". You may want to select someone from your team to put together the final report. 2. When you have the polished version of the essay finished, click on the title of the essay and then "copy" at the top of the page. Select "Final Version of . . . and number" and click next. |
WHEN YOU GO TO THE QUICKPLACE SITE CLICK ON THE NUMBER OF THE TEAM TO WHICH YOU HAVE BEEN ASSIGNED BELOW.
|
|
![]() |
|
|
TEAM 1 THE CASE OF ENRON: AN EXERCISE IN ETHICAL ANALYSIS Bertke, Fasquella, Green, Rismiller, Weaver, Whalen [Due 06/28] |
TEAM 2: THE CASE OF ENRON AN EXERCISE IN ETHICAL ANALYSIS Bergez, Branham, Burton, Gebhard, Maurer, Pasczcykowski, Wedemeyer [Due 06/28] |
TEAM 3: THE CASE OF ENRON AN EXERCISE IN ETHICAL ANALYSIS Brady, Cartwright, Griffin, Groshek, Guliants, Maruszewski, Simon [Due 06/28] |
|
TEAM 4: THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CORPORATE ETHICS PROGRAM FOR A CORPORATION IN A GLOBAL BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT Branham, Burton, Green, Griffin, Groshek, Rismiller, Weaver [Due 07/29] |
TEAM 5: THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CORPORATE ETHICS PROGRAM FOR A CORPORATION IN A GLOBAL BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT Bergez, Brady, Fasquelle, Gebhard, Paszczykowski, Simon, Wedemeyer [Due 7/29] |
TEAM 6:
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CORPORATE ETHICS PROGRAM FOR A CORPORATION IN A GLOBAL BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT Bertke, Cartwright, Guliants, Maruszewski, Maurer, Whalen [Due 7/29] |
|
WRITE AN ESSAY OF APPROXIMATELY 2,500 WORDS. [You might want to imagine that you are writing this at the request of the President of your company and you are the representative of your corporation.] |
| Teams 1, 2 and 3 will focus on the "The Case of Enron: An Exercise in Ethical Analysis." Teams 4, 5 and 6 will focus on "The Development of a Corporate Ethics Program for a Corporation in a Global Business Environment." |
|
|
| 1. All members of the team should engage in the discussion. There is no magic number for contributions to the discussion, but about 5 contributions per person would be a decent number to consider. All contributions to the discussion MUST be made by June 22 for the first report and July 22 for the second report . Decisions on how to compose the second report should be made by July 19. This is necessary to give enough time for the final version to be produced. |
| 2. The team will decide how it will go about generating a draft that will be put in the "Draft" folder. |
| 3. The team will designate who will refine the final version and put it in the "final version" folder. Place it in the folder as a WORD 2003 (.doc) document, not Word 2008 as a (.docx) document. |
| 4. Notify instructor when the final version is ready to be read. |