|
"A MODEL ADVANCE DIRECTIVE"
Reprinted from
The Patient Self-Determination
Act:
A Training Program for Health
Care Professionals
by
Lawrence P. Ulrich, Ph.D.
(Breckenridge Bioethics,
1991)
|
Introduction:
The following outline is intended
as a model which can be used in drafting an advance directive. It contains
suggestions of items which can be incorporated into a document which one wishes
to make both credible and specific. It can stand alone or be used as a
supplement to an official form which one's local state may mandate as
part of its advance directive legislation. To check
one's local state requirements and forms, go to .
[http://www.caringinfo.org/stateaddownload]
or
[http://www.guardianinsurance.com.au/ArticleLibrary/Facts-Health-Care-Advance-Directives.aspx]
It can also be used
to give specific directions to one's attorney-in-fact with health care
decision-making authority. In this way the attorney-in-fact will have some
documented evidence of the principal's wishes which will add credibility
to any decision which he/she might make on the principal's behalf.
Discussion of an advance
directive with one's physician and family is vital while the document is
being prepared. The physician can give the author information which is
essential to the document and can communicate to the author his/her commitment
to honoring it. Family members can discuss differences of opinion about
the decisions reflected in the document and, hopefully, resolve those differences
before the advance directive needs to be applied. Copies of the final advance
directive should be given to one's physician and appropriate family members
or significant others.
Any advance directive
should be reviewed periodically to be sure that it represents the current
thinking of the author and conforms to state law. It should be revised
when it is appropriate to do so.
It is not necessary
to address all of the items listed in the outline. This may be too much
detail for many individuals. They may eliminate whatever they choose not
to include. Others may add more specificity to this general orientation.
It is strongly suggested, however, that those writing an advance directive
pay special attention to addressing the items related to the values history
(#5), the quality of life (#5d), outcomes (##7 and 8), pain control (##2d,
10h, and 11h), medically administered nutrition and hydration (##10f and
11f), and CPR/DNR (##10k and 11k).
The rule of thumb is
that the more specific and credible the document is, the greater the likelihood
of its being honored.
1. Purpose of the
document.
a) To supplement the
standard form.
b) To give guidance
to caregivers and family members about the author's wishes regarding healthcare
decisions.
c) To eliminate second
guessing by others.
d) To provide clear
and convincing evidence in case of legal disputes.
e) To avoid wasting
personal economic resources.
2. Awareness of current
disease process.
a) Course of the disease.
b) Symptoms.
c) Possible complications.
d) Tolerable pain
levels.
e) Realistic expectations
concerning the disease.
3. Awareness of the
aging process.
a) Loss of physical
function.
b) Loss of mental
function.
c) Relation of death
to personal life.
d) Realistic expectations
about aging.
4. Possible disease
or disability.
a) Family history
of disease.
b) Personal history
of disease.
c) Concerns and fears
about disease or disability.
d) Risk of injury
as a factor in one's lifestyle.
5. Values history.
a) What has been important.
b) What is important
now.
c) What is most important
when values conflict.
d) The minimal quality
of life which can be tolerated.
6. Basic understandings.
a) Personal understanding
of a terminal condition.
b) Personal understanding
of the loss of decisional capacity.
c) Personal understanding
of what constitutes futile treatment.
7. Outcomes desired
from interventions.
a) Most desirable
level of functioning.
b) Return to a previous
level of functioning.
c) Acceptable level
of functioning.
8. Outcomes not desired
from interventions.
a) Least desirable
level of functioning.
b) Borderline levels
of functioning.
c) Unacceptable level
of functioning.
9. Where, in 7 and
8, do the following fit?
a) Permanent loss
of mental orientation.
b) Permanent loss
of consciousness.
10. Treatments desired.
a) Antibiotics.
b) Cardiac medications.
c) Chemotherapy.
d) Dialysis.
e) Level of care (hospital,
home, nursing home, hospice).
f) Medically administered
nutrition and hydration.
g) Oxygen.
h) Pain control.
i) Radiation therapy.
j) Respirators.
k) Resuscitation (CPR/DNR).
11. Treatments not
desired (Same list as in 10).
a) Antibiotics.
b) Cardiac medications.
c) Chemotherapy.
d) Dialysis.
e) Level of care (hospital,
home, nursing home, hospice).
f) Medically administered
nutrition and hydration.
g) Oxygen.
h) Pain control.
i) Radiation therapy.
j) Respirators.
k) Resuscitation (CPR/DNR).
12. Unexpected but
reasonably possible events which can occur.
a) What interventions
should be tried and for how long.
b) What interventions
should not be tried.
13. Reconciliation
with dying.
a) Acceptance of death.
b) Acceptance of responsibility
for decisions.
c) Relieving family
members and caregivers of guilt.
This
document may also be found in the Bioethics Handbook,
pages 211-215.