|
Several weeks ago I participated in a three day anti-racism training
workshop which was conducted here in Pittsburgh. The facilitators were
Rev. Joe Brandt, Executive Director of Crossroads Ministry, and Ms.
Barbara Jordan, a community organizer and educator from the Peoples
Institute for Survival and Beyond, a New Orleans' based sister
organization to Crossroads. Besides providing a very excellent and intense
experience of just how systemic racism is in our society, on a more
personal level it was a very rich reunion with these two highly skilled
and committed trainers. I had spent a day with Barbara down in New Orleans
during the Unitarian Universalist (UU) Urban Church weekend this past
January and she had a very good feeling about UUs. She was delighted to
meet someone from Pittsburgh who "had eaten her food, in her
community." Just as delightfully, Joe and I realized that we had
shared a ministerial experience some years back in the South Bronx. We learned and talked about
all of our mutual friends. What a treat for me. Crossroads Ministry is the
group which Mel Hoover has collaborated with in developing our UU
anti-racist training experiences, so there were nice personal connections
all around.
Early on in the workshop there was an exercise which focused on
"cultural racism and white cultural identity." Whites in the
workshop were asked to talk about white culture. Most couldn't or
wouldn't. The expression meant nothing to me. Nevertheless, we all
struggled with it. As time went on we discovered that, in a sense, it was
a trick question. The facilitators wanted the whites to struggle and to
discover that the expression did have little or no content. Racial
designations, white and black, are totally social constructs. "What
then," they asked, "would you say about your culture? How would
you define your culture and your relationship to it?" Though most of
the whites had a difficult time talking about her/his culture - some
resisted pretty strenuously - the trainers took a clear stand: if whites
are to come to the multi-cultural table, they - we - must reclaim our
individual cultural backgrounds. In many ways, we were reminded, African
Americans are way ahead of European Americans in retaining their cultural
identities.
In a sense, the exercise wasn't as tough for me as for some others. I
immediately thought of Boston, Irish and Catholic. It was clear to me
that's where this UU had to start; the music, the humor, the food - as
limited as the menu is - the faith, the working class, it was all there. I
was having a good time; it felt very good on many levels. In a
conversation later in the workshop, Joe mentioned a recently published
book entitled "How the Irish Became White." It's a book about
Irish emigration, race, class and U.S. labor history. I knew immediately I
had to get a copy and find out just what it was about.
It was a tough read. It was a story of primarily Irish Catholic
emigration before and after the potato famine - roughly 1840 to the Civil
War - and that people's struggle to survive in this white, Protestant
world. It's a sympathetic yet tragic story of how race has been a defining
characteristic in U.S. culture and how the race question has also plagued
the white working class in this country. One might say that it is a story
of how the Irish exchanged their greenness for whiteness, and collaborated
with the dominant white culture to continue the oppression of African
Americans.
Ironically, Irish Catholics came to this country as an oppressed race
yet quickly learned that to succeed they had to in turn oppress their
closest social class competitors, free Northern blacks. Back home these
"native Irish or papists" suffered something very similar to
American slavery under English Penal Laws. Yet, despite their
revolutionary roots as an oppressed group fighting for freedom and rights,
and despite consistent pleas from the great Catholic emancipator, Daniel
O'Connell, to support the abolitionists, the newly arrived Irish-Americans
judged that the best way of gaining acceptance as good citizens and to
counter the Nativist movement was to cooperate in the continued oppression
of African Americans. Ironically, at the same time they were collaborating
with the dominant culture to block abolition, they were garnering support
from among Southern, slaveholding democrats for Repeal of the oppressive
English Act of the Union back home. Some even convinced themselves that
abolition was an English plot to weaken this country.
Upon hearing of this position on the part of so many of his fellow
countrymen now residing in the United States, in 1843 O'Connell wrote:
"Over the broad Atlantic I pour forth my voice, saying, come out of
such a land, you Irishmen; or, if you remain, and dare countenance the
system of slavery that is supported there, we will recognize you as
Irishmen no longer." It's a tragic story. In a letter published in
the Liberator in 1854, it was stated that "passage to the
United States seems to produce the same effect upon the exile of Erin as
the eating of the forbidden fruit did upon Adam and Eve. In the morning,
they were pure, loving, and innocent; in the evening, guilty."
Irish and Africans Americans had lots in common and lots of contact
during this period; they lived side by side and shared work spaces. In the
early years of immigration the poor Irish and blacks were thrown together,
very much part of the same class competing for the same jobs. In the
census of 1850, the term mulatto appears for the first time due primarily
to inter-marriage between Irish and African Americans. The Irish were
often referred to as "Negroes turned inside out and Negroes as smoked
Irish." A famous quip of the time attributed to a black man went
something like this: "My master is a great tyrant, he treats me like
a common Irishman." Free blacks and Irish were viewed by the
Nativists as related, somehow similar, performing the same tasks in
society. It was felt that if amalgamation between the races was to happen,
it would happen between Irish and blacks. But, ultimately, the Irish made
the decision to embrace whiteness, thus becoming part of the system which
dominated and oppressed blacks. Although it contradicted their experience
back home, it meant freedom here since blackness meant slavery.
An article by a black writer in an 1860 edition of the Liberator
explained how the Irish ultimately attained their objectives:
"Fifteen or twenty years ago, a Catholic priest in Philadelphia said
to the Irish people in that city, 'You are all poor, and chiefly laborers,
the blacks are poor laborers; many of the native whites are laborers; now,
if you wish to succeed, you must do everything that they do, no matter how
degrading, and do it for less than they can afford to do it for.' The
Irish adopted this plan; they lived on less than the Americans could live
upon, and worked for less, and the result is, that nearly all the menial
employments are monopolized by the Irish, who now get as good prices as
anybody. There were other avenues open to American white men, and though
they have suffered much, the chief support of the Irish has come from the
places from which we have been crowded."
Once the Irish secured themselves in those jobs, they made sure blacks
were kept out. They realized that as long as they continued to work
alongside blacks, they would be considered no different. Later, as Irish
became prominent in the labor movement, African Americans were excluded
from participation. In fact, one of the primary themes of How the Irish
Became White is the way in which left labor historians, such as the
highly acclaimed Herbert Gutman, have not paid sufficient attention to the
problem of race in the development of the labor movement.
nd so, we have the tragic story of how one oppressed "race,"
Irish Catholics, learned how to collaborate in the oppression of another
"race," Africans in America, in order to secure their place in
the white republic. Becoming white meant losing their greenness, i.e.,
their Irish cultural heritage and the legacy of oppression and
discrimination back home. Imagine if the Irish had remained green after
their arrival and formed an alliance with their fellow oppressed
co-workers, the free blacks of the North. Imagine if they had chosen to
include their black brothers and sisters in the union movement to wage a
class battle against the dominant white culture which ruthlessly pitted
them against one another.
Oh that there had been other Irish Americans such as the soldiers from
St. Patrick's Battalion who fought on the side of Mexico in the War of
1848, who did remain green and fought against oppression. So perhaps we
Irish in America must reclaim our greenness and, perhaps, our anti-racism
trainers are right that we all must reclaim our cultural heritage and
bring it to the multicultural table. The only stipulation is that we do it
in a decidedly anti-racist manner and in solidarity with oppressed classes
of people. Maybe we can all share in the sentiment proclaimed in the 1991
movie about Dublin, "The Commitments," when it was stated that
"The Irish are the blacks of Europe, so say it loud, I'm black and
I'm proud."
|