Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: Iceland+gene

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Document 1 of 3. Next Document

Copyright 2000 The Christian Science Publishing Society  
The Christian Science Monitor

June 30, 2000, Friday

SECTION: WORLD; PRIVACY; ETHICS; AND THE QUEST FOR KNOWLEDGE; Pg. 6

LENGTH: 1082 words

HEADLINE: Tempest in Iceland's gene pool

BYLINE: Colin Woodard, Special to The Christian Science Monitor

DATELINE: REYKJAVIK, ICELAND

HIGHLIGHT:
Controversy over a private company's plan to compile the genetic history of an entire population.

BODY:

 
Iceland is a primeval island of frigid deserts, towering glaciers, and barren volcanic lava fields on the fringe of the Arctic Circle. But in a country whose geography is notable for its variety, the population is just as unusual for its sameness.
 
Iceland's government is looking to tap that largely homogenous gene pool as a profitable resource by approving a major genetics project. But this project is now the subject of an acrimonious ethics debate - here and abroad - that touches many of the core issues surrounding the mapping of the human genome.
 
The debate has taken on new immediacy as the pace of genetic discovery picked up this week. First came the announcement that efforts to map the human genome were all but complete.
 
Then, the Edinburgh, Scotland-based company that cloned Dolly the sheep revealed it had taken the process a step further, cloning two lambs, Cupid and Diana, from genetically modified cells. The technique has possible future implications for animal-to-human organ transplants.
 
Iceland, with an economy traditionally dependent on fishing, is now seeing a boom in the high-tech and service industries. To help fuel biotech growth, the Reykjavik government earlier this year granted a license to a private company to create and operate a computerized database of the entire nation's healthcare records, which date back to 1915.
 
The company, Reykjavik-based deCode Genetics, plans to cross-reference the healthcare records with genealogical and genetic databases. With the combined system, subscribers to the deCode databases would be able to trace the family relationships of not only almost every Icelander alive, but nearly everyone who has lived here for centuries past.
 
Iceland has experienced little immigration over the past 1,100 years, so almost all of its 275,000 people are descended from a small group of 9th-century Norse and Celtic settlers.
 
Icelanders are also passionate genealogists, and researching family trees has long been a national pastime.
 
Studying such an isolated and well documented population simplifies scientists' efforts to research possible links between family history and certain diseases.
 
But the Icelandic Medical Association says the project is a serious violation of personal privacy and damaging to the doctor-patient relationship. One physician-led citizen's group, Mannvernd, intends to sue the government and deCode to test the constitutionality of the legislation that made the project possible.
 
"Iceland's healthcare information has been commercialized and our genetic information has been turned into a commodity," says Petur Hauksson, a clinical psychiatrist and chairman of Mannvernd.
 
DeCode also has begun collecting blood samples from thousands of Icelanders, with their consent. The DNA in those samples will be isolated, genotyped, and entered into its genetic database. All such information will be encrypted by a government-appointed body to protect individual privacy, the company says.
 
"The reason we have medicine as it exists today is because our parents and grandparents supported and participated in medical research," says deCode founder and president Kari Stefansson. "I'm convinced that most people in this world are willing to make sacrifices when it comes to our medical privacy to make sure that we can advance medicine [for] our children and grandchildren."
 
DeCode says its combined data-processing system could assist in developing new and more effective treatments for some diseases. It has also put Iceland at the forefront of a growing high-tech industry and attracted dozens of Icelandic scientists back home.
 
The company, which is registered in Delaware, will pay Iceland $ 12 million for the exclusive right to create and operate the healthcare database for 12 years; Iceland could earn up to an additional $ 1 million a year in shared profits and its healthcare system can use the database for free. DeCode also has a $ 200 million research collaboration with Swiss pharmaceutical giant Hoffmann-La Roche, deCode's largest shareholder.
 
The company's project has the support of more than 75 percent of Iceland's population, according to public opinion polls, and most of the country's political leaders. But Iceland's medical community opposes it, raising concerns that the data could one day be used by insurance companies and employers against individuals whose genes are linked to possible disease.
 
One-third of the country's physicians have declared they will not turn over patient records, despite deCode's privacy assurances.
 
"Nobody was asked if they want their health information released because the law says you don't have to," says Gudmundur Bjornsson, a hospital director and former head of the Icelandic Medical Association. "We offered to help deCode obtain the informed consent of every Icelander alive, but they said no."
 
Icelanders can opt out of the healthcare database by filing special paperwork. But those who do not file - including the deceased, newborns, and the mentally ill - are presumed to give consent.
 
As in the US, genealogical information here is considered public domain. Iceland has been criticized by many bioethicists for its use of "presumed consent" in the healthcare database.
 
But Dr. Stefansson says this is in line with healthcare research practice throughout the Western world. "In the United States, you have enormous databases containing the health records of millions of individuals," he says. "They're also based on presumed consent."
 
George Annas, head of the health law department at Boston University's School of Public Health, says that generally medical records in the US can be used without a patient's consent, provided that individuals cannot be identified by researchers. Use of children's records is generally considered unethical, he says.
 
"What's unusual here is that Stefansson will be rolling that information together with genetic and genealogical data," Professor Annas says. "He doesn't know where that's going to take him."
 
For the medical ethics field, it's uncharted waters. "Iceland gives the whole world an opportunity to think through issues that nobody has been able to do yet," Annas adds. "It's a good opportunity at fairly low cost to try to sort through these issues."

(c) Copyright 2000. The Christian Science Publishing Society



LOAD-DATE: June 29, 2000




Document 1 of 3. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: Iceland+gene
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Iceland's gene pool holds the key to curing diseases. But drug firms will

BYLINE: BY ROBIN MCKIE

BODY:
INSIDE the Reykjavik headquarters of DeCode Genetics, a guard stands on permanent duty outside a small, panelled room containing a double-locked steel safe. Only a handful of staff have keys. The safe, however, is no mere repository for financial secrets or bonds. They are the genetic records of tens of thousands of Icelanders and their value is inestimable, said DeCode's president, Dr Kari Stefansson.

A former Harvard researcher, Stefansson set up DeCode this year to collate his countrymen's DNA records - and sell them as sources of future medicines. International pharmaceutical companies will use them to pinpoint genes that dispose people to disease, he predicted. And he was right. Tightly inbred populations such as Iceland's are invaluable for tracing disease genes and have led to the creation of a generation of 'gene prospectors', scientists who have begun poring over the world's isolated peoples - in Tristan da Cunha, Easter Island, the Brazilian highlands and, of course, Iceland - in search of DNA that can be linked to ailments such as asthma, multiple sclerosis, diabetes, schizophrenia and cancer.

These populations have limited pools of genes, which makes it much easier for researchers to pinpoint the genes that predispose people to individual disease. And medicines created in the wake of these discoveries will be worth millions of dollars.

The drug companies' efforts, however, have not been universally welcomed. Gene prospecting has been labelled the ultimate exploitation of the Third World, with companies - such as Sequana Therapeutics of La Jolla, California; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, of Massachusetts; and Genset, of Paris - being accused of acquiring the DNA of indigenous peoples in order to fill corporate coffers without thought, concern or benefit to natives.

In addition, some scientists say companies are freezing access to specimens and information. While academics freely exchange data, companies - concerned about securing patents for their discoveries - maintain tight secrecy and insist that university scientists who collaborate with them sign complex agreements that ensure their silence. Medical research suffers as a result.

'It's helicopter science,' said Stefansson. 'Companies fly in, take what they want and then fly out again. When I was at Harvard, I saw this happening and I decided no one was going to do that to Iceland.'

So he set up DeCode, with the backing of local government and academics, and funded by $ 12 million ( pounds 7.5m) of international venture capital. Already tens of thousands of Icelanders have given blood and their family histories. Eventually Stefansson hopes most of his 270,000 countrymen and women - even Bjork - will contribute.

Companies will then have to pay for access to Iceland's unique genetic heritage, formed when the island was settled by Vikings 1,100 years ago and distilled through two subsequent population crashes - an outbreak of bubonic plague in the 1400s and an eruption of the volcano Heckla, which triggered famine in the 1700s.

The reduction in Iceland's gene pool has been dramatic and the usefulness of this limiting effect to science is revealed through the first ailment that was tackled by scientists using DeCode's database. In only 10 weeks they were able to pinpoint the gene for the world's most common neurological movement disorder - 'familial essential tremor', an inherited shakiness of the limbs.

Now projects aimed at pinpointing genes associated with multiple sclerosis, pre-eclampsia and alcoholism are being established between DeCode and various pharmaceutical companies.

And once these genes are found, the abnormal proteins that they are responsible for manufacturing can be isolated and studied. Drugs can then be made to counter their effects, tested and eventually marketed round the world. This technology offers drug companies a chance to save lives and make money - though not in Iceland, for one of DeCode's stipulations is that all medicines made from use of its DNA database must be provided free to Icelanders.

'We are going to make sure Icelanders can exploit their own genetic heritage,' said Stefansson. 'That is the whole raison d'etre of DeCode. There will be no DNA exports from this country.'

This position, however, contrasts with many other parts of the world. In Tristan da Cunha, for example, scientists working for the University of Toronto have used local populations to unravel a gene which they have linked to asthma.

Although the disease has clear environmental causes, scientists have long suspected that asthma also has a strong inherited component, and on Tristan da Cunha they found the perfect laboratory. In the Sixties, the tiny island's interbred population was evacuated to Britain after a volcanic eruption. To their amazement, doctors discovered that half of them had a history of asthma, at least three times the asthma rates in normal populations.

Scientists believe that the island's original settlers - a family who remained after the British garrison quit Tristan in 1817 - were asthmatics. Now their interbred descendants - all 300 are cousins - are riddled with the disease. However, as several genes appear to be involved in disposing people to asthma, the severity of the condition still varies among the population.

Nevertheless, Toronto researchers Noe Zamel and Arthur Slatsky have isolated one of the genes they believe causes asthma on the island.

But because their institution had suffered cuts in government funds, a deal was signed between the university and Sequana Therapeutics. Sequana has invested an astonishing $ 70m in asthma research and, thanks to its support, Zamel and Slatsky were able to carry on.

'We simply could not have done this without Sequana's backing,' said Dr Slatsky.

But Sequana's backing has a price. Although the Toronto team has found and cloned the first gene to be linked to asthma, it cannot publish details until Sequana has established patent rights for the discovery and for any medicines that might be developed from it.

Nor is Tristan Sequana's only target. It has set up deals to use DNA from populations in Easter Island, Brazil and China, and there is no provision for native people to be provided with drug discoveries derived from their DNA.

These developments alarm some researchers, although Dr Slatsky defended Sequana and other pharmaceutical companies. 'Yes, companies force us to keep quiet about our work for longer than we normally would. But scientists always think before they rush to print. All we are doing is extending the period a little bit. And as for Tristan da Cunha, Sequana has promised that islanders will be given free supplies of any asthma drugs developed from their DNA.'