Race, Health Care and the Law 
Speaking Truth to Power!

Why Race Matters?

Checkout: Reclamationgallery.com

Vernellia R. Randall
Professor of Law and
Web Editor

 

Search this site
  powered by FreeFind
 

 
What's New
Awards and Recognitions
 

Chapters

Health Status
Organization and Financing
Access to Health Care
Quality of Health Care
Health Care Research

Bio-ethical Issues
Health and Human Rights
International Issues

The Health Care Challenge

Eliminating Disparities
 

Syllabi

AIDS
American Health Care Law
Bioterrorism 
Health Care Malpractice

Tobacco

Violence and Public Health
 

Surveys

 

Favorite Poetry

Invictus
The Bridge Poem
Still I Rise
No Struggle No Progress
 

Related Websites

Race and Racism
Gender and the Law
Legal Education
Personal Homepage

 

 

Vernellia R. Randall 

Why disaggregate health and health care data based on race?

Because Race Matters.

Race matters because it is an imperfect proxy for racism and racial discrimination.

Clearly, race doesn’t matter as a genetic concept. The idea that race is important because of a notion of genetic homogeneity has been thoroughly debunked.[29] Furthermore, race, as a scientific concept, never rested on firm scientific foundation.[29] Biologically, there are no pure, distinct races. Which is not to say that there may not be bio-chemical differences among individuals. Some of those differences might be closely associated with groups that we categorize by race. For instance, in a study of 1,256 female and 1,603 male patients, women had more rapid decreases in CD4+ T cell counts than men and non-whites had slower decreases than whites.[1, 13]

If race does not distinguish humans from one another genetically, then why does it matter? Several studies document that "race" has been shaped by cultural, political, ideological and legal functions in society. That is, "race" is a social construct; something that has meaning only because the society gives it meaning.[14] Such construct is no less powerful than a biological construct. Once society conveys meaning that meaning has impact and consequences.

Race matters because society engages in racism and racial discrimination which affects health status and health care.[16]

Race Matters in Health Status.

There are many examples of disparities in health status between racial/ethnic groups. In the United Kingdom, Black people tend to have a greater incidence of high blood pressure than white people.[24] In Brazil, the infant mortality rate for children under 12 months is 62.3 per 1000 for Black and Brown children compared to 37.3 for White.[7] The life expectancy in the United States is 26 years longer than life expectancy in Haiti.[32] In Australia, life expectancy at birth is 56.9 years for Indigenous men and 61.7 years for Indigenous women, compared with 75.2 years and 81.1 years, respectively, for non-Indigenous men and women.[2] The American Indian death rate from diabetes is 27.8 per 100,000, compared with 7.3 for Whites--380 percent higher.[19] In the United States, Black women are three times more likely to die while pregnant than White women, and four times more likely to die in child birth. The maternal mortality rate for Hispanic women is 23 percent higher than for non-Hispanic women. Disparity occurs at all income-levels.[19] The mortality stratum for all of Africa is either high or very high Child /Adult, while all of Europe is either low or very low child and most of Europe is low or very low adult. Only Estonia, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Lithuania, Moldova, Russia and Ukraine have high adult.[32] By any standard, "racially disadvantaged" groups fail to have "a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being".[31]

The current health disparity is the cumulative result of both past and current racism. In general "racially disadvantaged" groups have less education and fewer educational opportunities. Further, "racially disadvantaged" groups are disproportionately homeless and have significantly poorer housing options. In addition, "racially disadvantaged" groups disproportionately work in lowest pay and high health risk occupations. However, even when you control for income or wealth, racism and racial discrimination continues to exist and thus, race matters in health status.[26,21]

Race Matters in Health Care.

Race matters in health care because institutional racism establishes separate and independent barriers. Institutional racism refers to the denial of opportunities and equal rights to individuals and groups that results from the normal operations of the institutions in a society.

"Those established laws, customs, practices which systematically reflect and produce racial inequalities. . .If racist consequences accrue to institutional laws, customs, or practices, the institution is racist whether or not the individuals maintaining those practices have racist intentions.[14]

Thus, racial discrimination can occur in institutions without any specific intent by any specific individual to deprive others. In fact, institutional discrimination can occur without any specific individual being aware that others are being deprived.[25] While data on institutional racism in health care is scarce, it does exist.

For instance, in the United Kingdom, Caribbean men are less likely to be registered with a general practitioner than white.[18] In Yugoslavia, on average, 13% of Roma People in Belgrade are not registered in the regular health care system.[23] In Nepal among the Dalits, birth control is unknown and unavailable.[5]

Perhaps the most comprehensive data about institutional racism in health care comes from the United States. The research from the United States clearly demonstrates that within a country, racial barriers to quality health care may manifest themselves in a number of ways: Lack of Economic Access to Health Care; Barriers to Hospitals and Health Care Institutions; Barriers to Physicians and Other Providers; Discriminatory Policies and Practices; Lack of Language and Culturally Competent Care; Inadequate Inclusion in Health Care Research; Commercialization of Health Care, and the Disintegration of Traditional Medicine. However, the most well researched racial barrier to quality health care is Disparities in Medical Treatment. For instance, in the United States, Blacks are more likely to require health care services than Whites, but are less likely to receive them.[19] Studies have shown racial disparity in both quality and availability of treatment in AIDS,[6] cardiology,[22] cardiac surgery,[17] kidney disease,[8] organ transplantation,[10] internal medicine,[33] obstetrics,[28] prescription drugs,[12] treatment for mental illness,[27] and hospital care.[4]

In the United States, Whites are three times more likely to undergo bypass surgery than non-Whites.[20] Non-White patients seeking admission to nursing homes experience longer delays before placement than White patients.[19] Doctors are less likely to recommend breast cancer screening for Hispanic women than for White women.[20] Non-White pneumonia patients receive fewer hospital services than White patients.[20] Poor urban Black and Hispanic neighborhoods average 24 physicians per 100,000 people, compared to 69 physicians per 100,000 for poor White communities.[20]

In the United States, there are marked differences in time spent, quality of care and quantity of doctor’s office visits between Whites and Blacks. Even when controlling for income, education, and ability to pay, Whites are more likely to receive more and more thorough diagnostic work and better treatment and care than people of color. Furthermore, researchers have concluded that doctors are less aggressive when treating patients from "racially disadvantaged" groups.[19] At least one study indicated a combined affect of race and gender resulting in significantly different health care for Black women than white women and men.[19]

Certainly, difference in treatment is based on a number of different factors including clinical characteristics, income, medical or biological differences. Nevertheless, race plays an independent role,[11] and of all the influences on the health of "racially disadvantaged" groups, it is imperative that health care systems be free of racial discrimination - both individual and institutional.[19]

Race Matters because discrimination based on perceived racial grouping continues to exist.

Disaggregation of Data and Racial Discrimination

Collecting health status and health care data disaggregated based on race may make racism and racial discrimination in health care more visible, but it is not without its difficulties. First, there may be measurement issue due to observer bias that can result in undercounting.[30] That is, where the race is reported by an observer rather than the person or a relative, there can be significant misclassification. For instance, in a study in Oklahoma 28% of the Indian infants were misclassified as another race on the death certificate.[15,9] Second, there are reliability issues because of changes in racial identity.[30] For instance, between 1960 and 1990 there was a six-fold increase in the American Indian population that cannot be explained by either biological growth or by migration.[30] Third, there are a number of definitional problems: how to classify multiracial person; what groups and subgroups to define; and the lack of uniformed classification.[30] Fourth, some populations are difficult to count which results in a census undercount and an inflated denominator in rates.[30] Finally, other issues can include the small size of some of the population groups, geographic dispersement.[29]

Given the array of potential issues, some researchers have argued that health data should not be disaggregated by race.[3] It could be argued that the use of race in health data promotes and maintain the view that race is a biological concept. Or that racial categorizations perpetuates and encourages racial fragmentation. Such views see potential for harm from the use of race.

However, there are a number of important and compelling reasons for disaggregating health status and health care data by race. First, the use of race is not the cause of racism but the result of racism. That is, groups have been discriminated against others on the based of color; established hierarchy and superiority based on color; and race is the terminology used to capture this situation. Consequently, racism and racial discrimination will continue to exist (that is discrimination based on color) even if terminology change or cease to exist. For instance, even though race data is not collected in the European Union in the same way as it is in the United States, racism and racial discrimination continues to exist as a worldwide problem. Even when you control for socioeconomic status, health status and health care differentials continue to exist.

Second, racism and racial discrimination has implication for every institution and social practice. Health status is impacted by racial discrimination in housing, employment, environment, education and other institutions.

Third, calls to not disaggregate data ignores the power and status differentials that exist among all racial groups.[29] This point is illustrated when one considers the disproportionate percentage of racially disadvantaged who are poor.

Fourth, as long as some groups continue to experience discrimination, it is important to monitor their well being.[29]

Fifth, to fully understand the health status of all individuals as well as to recognize the barriers they face in obtaining quality health care, it is important to collect the most complete data on "racially disadvantaged" groups, and "sub-groups".[19] The lack of a uniform data collection method makes obtaining an accurate and specific description of race discrimination in health care difficult, if not impossible. Such data collection has to include collecting data on provider and institutional behavior.

"Although not useful as a biological category, race has been and is likely to continue to be an important social category. It is what sociologists call a master status–a central determinant of social identity and obligations, as well as of access to societal rewards and resources. From our earliest health records, race has been an empirically robust predictor of variations in morbidity and mortality. Collecting the appropriate data on race can facilitate ongoing monitoring of the magnitude of differentials, enhanced understanding of their causes and the development of effective interventions to address them."[29]

Race Matters.

Race Matters because racism and racial discrimination matters.

Disaggregating data based on race is important because it helps to make the impact of racism and racial discrimination visible and, thus allows us to address the root problem.

References

  1. Anastos, K., et. al., Association of race and gender with HIV-1 RNA levels and immunologic progression, 24 Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 218-227 (July, 2000).
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Health and welfare of Australia's Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Canberra: ABS, 1999. (Catalogue No. 4704.0.)
  3. Bagley, C., A Plea for ignoring Race and Including Insured status in American Research Reports on Social Science and Medicine, 40 Social Science Medicine 1017-1019 (1995).
  4. Bennett, C., Racial Differences in Care among Hospitalized Patients with Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia, 55 Archives of Internal Medicine 1586 (August 1995)
  5. Dalit in Nepal and Alternative Report for WCAR-2001, Jana Uttha Pratisthan (April 2001)
  6. De Noon, D.J., Aids Care Not Color Blind, Aids Weekly 2 (Sept. 11 1995)
  7. Dos Palmares, Escrito Nacional Zumbi, Race Inequalities in Brazil (August 2000)
  8. Eggers, P.W., Effect of Transplantation on the Medicare End-stage Renal Disease Program, 318 New England Journal of Medicine 223-29 (1988).
  9. Frost, F., et. al., Racial Misclassification of Native Americans in Surveillance Epidemiology and end results cancer Registry, 84 Journal of National Cancer Institute 957-962 (1992)
  10. Gaston, R.S., et. al., Racial Equity in Renal Transplantation, 270 Journal of American Medical Association 1352 (1993)
  11. Gornick, M.E., et. al., Effects of Race and Income on Mortality and Use of Services among Medicare Beneficiaries, 335 New England Journal of Medicine. 791 (1996)
  12. Hahn, B.A, Children's Health: Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Use of Prescription Medications, 95 Pediatrics 727 (1995)
  13. Immunology Racial Variation Found in Rate of CD4 Depletion in HIV-1, AIDS Weekly Plus (September 23, 1996)
  14. Jones, J.M., Prejudice and Racism (1972)
  15. Kennedy, R. D. and Deapen, R.E., Differences between Oklahoma and Indian Infant Mortality and other Races, 106 Public Health Report 97-99 (1991).
  16. Kreiger, N., "Embodying Inequality: A review of Concepts, Measures and Methods for studying Health Consequences of Discrimination", 29 International Journal of Health Services 295-352 (1999).
  17. Maynard, C. et. al., Blacks in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study: Race and Clinical Decision Making, 76 American Journal of Public Health 1446 (1986)
  18. Nazroo, J.Y. , Health and Health Services, in Ethnic Minorities in Britain: Diversity and Disadvantage, Tariq Modood and Richard Berthhoud, et. al. Editors, p. 224-258 (London, England 1997)
  19. Randall, V.R., Racist Health Care: Reforming an Unjust Health Care System  to Meet The Needs of African-Americans, 3 Health Matrix 127-194 (Spring, 1993).
  20. Report of the United States Commission on Civil Rights, The Health Care Challenge: Acknowledging Disparity, Confronting Discrimination, and Ensuring Equality , Volume I and Volume II (September 1999).
  21. Rubin, S. J., Economic and Social Human Rights and the New International Economic Order, 1 American University Journal of International Law & Policy 67 (1986)
  22. Schulman, K.A, et. al., The Effect of Race and Sex on Physicians' Recommendations for Cardiac Catheterization, 340 New England Journal of Medicine 618 (Feb. 25, 1999)
  23. Survey, " The Roma from Belgrade Settlements", Oxfam,, GB office in Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (April 2001).
  24. Torkington, N.P.K., Black Health : A Political Issue, p. 50 (Liverpool, England 1991)
  25. Ture, K. and Hamilton, C., Black Power: The Politics of Liberation (1992)
  26. United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report, 29- 30 (1998);
  27. Wade, J.C., Institutional Racism: An Analysis of the Mental Health System, 63 American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 536 (1993).
  28. Wenneker, M.B. and Epstein, A.M., Racial Inequalities in the Use of Procedures for Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease in Massachusetts, 261 Journal of American Medical Association 253 (1989).
  29. Williams, D.R., Race and Health: Basic Questions, Emerging Directions, 7 Ann. Epidemiol 322-333 (1997).
  30. Williams, D.R., Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status: Measurement and Methodological Issues, 26(3) International Journal of Health Services 483-505 (1996).
  31. World Health Organization Const. Preamble (1946).
  32. World Health Organization, The World Health Report 2000 (2000)
  33. Yergan, J., et al., Relationship Between Patient Race and the Intensity of Hospital Services, 25 Medical Care 592 (1987)
 
Related Pages:
Home ] Up ] Racist Health Care ] Using Civil Rights Law to Eliminate Health Disparities ] Racist laws which effect Hispanic Health Care ] Minorities Health Access ] Access to Health Care and Minorities ] Discrimination and Inaccessibility ] [ Why Race Matters? ] Discrimination and Quality ] Racial Profiling in Health Care ] Self-Perpetuating Mythology - the Degenerate Black Patient ] Health and Civil Rights: Unfinished Agenda ] Lawyers Seek Remedies for Health Care Disparities ] Race Medicine and HealthCare in LA County ]
Subsequent Pages:
Home ] Up ]
Previous Pages:
Home ] Organ Transplantation and Advanced Technoloty ] Racial Discrimination ] Legislating a Public Health Nightmare: the Anti-immigrant Provisions of the "Contract with America" Congress ] Culturally Competent Care ] Mental Health Care and Race ] Site of Medical Care: Do Racial And Ethnic Differences Persist? ]
Back Home Up Next

Always Under Construction!

Always Under Construction!

 

Contact Information:
Professor Vernellia R. Randall
Institute on Race, Health Care and the Law
The University of Dayton School of Law
300 College Park 
Dayton, OH 45469-2772
Email: randall@udayton.edu

 

Last Updated:
 03/10/2010

You are visitor number:
Hit Counter
since Sept. 2001

Copyright @ 1993, 2008. Vernellia R. Randall 
All Rights Reserved.