Law 6107  Criminal Law
Professor Vernellia R. Randall
The University of Dayton School of Law

Problem - State v Koppersmith
Please email me regarding any typos, misspelling, etc.

 
Syllabus
01: Introduction
02: Basic Elements
03: Property Crimes
04: Personal Crimes
05: Anticipatory Crimes
06: Defenses
07: Accomplices
08: Criminal Justice
 Koppersmith and his wife were arguing in the yard outside of their residence. Cindy tried to enter the house to end the argument, but Koppersmith prevented her from going inside. A physical confrontation ensued, and Cindy fell off of a porch into the yard. She died as a result of a skull fracture to the back of her head.

In a statement he made to law enforcement officials after the incident, Koppersmith gave the following summary of the events leading up to Cindy's death. He and Cindy had been arguing and were on a porch outside of their residence. Cindy had wanted to go inside the house, but he had wanted to resolve the argument first. Cindy had tried to go into the house two or three times, but he had stopped her from doing so. As she tried to go inside, he stepped in front of her and pushed her back. Cindy punched at him, and he grabbed her. When Cindy tried to go inside again, he wrapped his arms around her from behind to stop her. Cindy bit him on the arm, and he “slung” her and she fell to the ground. . He jumped off of the porch and straddled her, grabbing her by the shoulders, shaking her and telling her to calm down. When he realized she was not moving, he lifted her head and noticed blood all over his hands.

He rolled her over and found a brick covered with blood under her head. Koppersmith stated that, although Cindy fell near a flowerbed, he did not know there were bricks in the grass. He stated that he did not intend to throw her onto a brick or harm her in any way when he “slung” her, and that he did not intend to hit her head on a brick or otherwise harm her when he grabbed and shook her after she had fallen

The medical examiner, Dr. Gregory Wanger, indicated that the pattern on the injury to the victim's skull matched the pattern on one of the bricks found at the scene. He concluded that her injuries could have been caused by her falling off of the porch and hitting her head on a brick or from her head being slammed into a brick. Should the prosecutor charge Koppersmith with “criminally negiglent homicide”, “reckless mansalughter” or “intentional murder”? Why?
 
 
Unit 2: Basic Elements
02 Actus Reus
03 Mens Rea
04 Nonintent
05 Mistake
06 Causation
Lessons Outline

 

 

Always Under Construction!

Always Under Construction!

Copyright @ 2005, 2007
Vernellia Randall.  All Rights Reserved

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, some material on this website is provided for comment, background information, research and/or educational purposes only, without permission from the copyright owner(s), under the "fair use" provisions of the federal copyright laws. These materials may not be distributed for other purposes without permission of the copyright owner(s).

Last Updated:
Thursday, September 06, 2007  

You are visitor number
Hit Counter  
Since June 22, 2005