|
|
4
Outstanding!
|
3
Way to go!
|
2
Good job!
|
1- Needs Improvement.
|
|
Scope of Postings |
Student
consistently identifies important points; clarifies difficult concepts, and frequently tried to facilitate others understanding;
made significant postings about
information or news about professional
responsibility, particular diversity issues
|
Student
generally identifies important points;
occasionally clarifies difficult concepts, and generally tried to facilitate others understanding;
made occassional post information or news about
professional responsibility, particular
diversity issues
|
Student
generally identifies important points; clarifies difficult concepts, and generally tried to facilitate others understanding;
post information or news about professional
responsibility, particular diversity issues |
Student
occassionaly identifies important points; clarifies difficult concepts, and generally tried to facilitate others understanding;
post information or news about professional
responsibility, particular diversity issues |
|
|
Participant is engaged in the
class discussion at least three times a week
and often references the reading materials
and comments of others in a specific and
thoughtful way; Shows a clear understanding
of the topics under discussion. Provides
support from personal experience.
|
Participant is engaged in the
class discussion at least twice a week and
occasionally references the reading
materials and comments of others in a
specific and thoughtful way; Shows a good
understanding of the topics under
discussion. Provides some support from
personal experience.
|
Participant is engaged in the class
discussion at least once a week, but rarely
references the reading materials and
comments of others in a specific and
thoughtful way; Shows a basic understanding
of topics under discussion. Provides little
support from personal experience.
|
Either does not engage in the
class discussion OR does not
reference the reading materials and comments
of others in a specific and thoughtful way;
Shows no understanding of topics. Provides
no support from personal experience.
|
|
|
Contributes many useful ideas that
demonstrate connections between the
assignment and the class which required
thoughtful efforts.
|
Contributes limited ideas that demonstrate
connections between the assignment and the
class which demonstrated thoughtful efforts.
|
Contributes an idea that demonstrates a
connection between the assignment and the
class but required little thoughtful effort.
|
Contributes no ideas that demonstrate
connections between the assignment and the
class and/ or showed little or no effort in
composing the thread.
|
|
|
Responded in a respectful fashion to all
peers. If disagreeing with another group
members' ideas, the student stated his or
her disagreement or objections clearly, yet
politely;
Postings and replies are professional in
nature and support the learning environment
by being related to the thread and using
positive language.
|
Responded in a respectful fashion to most
peers. Student stated any disagreements
politely; Postings and replies are
professional in nature and while supportive
of the learning environment may occasionally
be tangental to
the discussion in a distractionary manner.
|
Responded in a disrespectful way to some
peers. Stated some disagreements in a
politely; Postings and replies show a lack
of professionalism through frequent
mechanical errors, distracting the flow of
conversation, or communicating in a critical
manner
|
The participant was rude or abusive to other
course participants;
Postings and replies show a disregard for
clear communication or the need to be
supportive to classmates.
|
|
|
Student's original posting is cleary
understood.
|
Student's original posting is
mostly understood.
|
Student's original posting is difficult to
understand.
|
Student's original posting does not make
sense.
|