This website is no longer being maintained at this location.
As of March 6, 2007 it moved to:
http://www.onlineasp.org.
This site will continue to exist here till December 30, 2007.
If you are linked to this site please establish a link with the new site.

 

For information about the University of Dayton's Academic Support Program
contact Dean Lori Shaw.

 

For information about Professor Randall's Academic Support Services for Minority Students
go to The JD Project, Inc.

 

 

 

Do Attend Class Ultimately its the professor who grades you and you need to know her expectations. 

Synthesis requires you to integrate into your analysis - policy and values with the law. Class is where you will get many of the policy issues and discuss how they affect the law. 

Finally, some professors have an attendance requirement. Failure to attend class can result in a failing grade in the course. 
 

Do be prepared for class Do focus on the reasoning in the assigned cases. 

Do be prepared to (at a minimum) discuss:  Essential Facts Trial Court decisions Appellate Court Decisions (where appropriate) Issue(s) on Appeal Holdings or rule of the case  Rationale or gist of the court's reasoning
 

 

Do Make Your Own Judgment about the case Do not take the cases as gospel.  Judges are people too;  their reasoning is subjective and tailored to get a desired result. Cases in books are often picked: for purposes of comparison and criticism. 
 

Do consider the decision with healthy skepticism. 
 

Do Make Practical and Fair arguments Don't' challenge a decision with generalities or loose talk 

Don't disagree "as a matter of principle" or because the "decision doesn't make sense" 

Do articulate the principles that the decision ignores; 

Do articulate why the decision doesn't make sense. 

Do consider the social, political, economic impact of the decision. The law is inherently practical, subjective and value orientated. 

Do avoid arguments that would impose an unconscionable hardship or lead to obviously unfair results. 
 

Do answer the Professor's hypos using the court's Reasoning not the rule. The purpose of hypos is to test just how far the rules in assigned cases can be extended. You are expected to determine whether the various facts in the hypos are sufficiently similar to the facts in the assigned case that the same result should be obtained. 

Don't jump to conclusions. 

See if you can discover if it would be inconsistent with the reasoning to apply the rule.

Do actively participate Class participation helps you to develop your ability to do analyze and argue orally.
Do anything that will help you on the exam, that will help you become a better lawyer, make you a better person; Ignore anything that will not!  Failure to understand what is going on in the classroom can undermine your success. 

Be prepared mentally and emotionally for the entire exam! 
 

Do Stop Worrying Do Stop wasting time worrying about class participation. Do remember that the exam not the classroom is the only meaningfully opportunity to show that you have what it takes to be a lawyer. 

Don't worry about how you sound; about what you don't know. 
 

Don't worry about what other students might think. 
 

Don't worry about what the professor might think.

 

 

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, some material on this website is provided for comment, background information, research and/or educational purposes only, without permission from the copyright owner(s), under the "fair use" provisions of the federal copyright laws. These materials may not be distributed for other purposes without permission of the copyright owner(s).
 

 Copyright @ 1997,  2004
Vernellia Randall. All Rights Reserved