54. FN54. Marcin, supra note 17, at 105 (discussing
the ancient history of type theory including astrology).
55. FN55. See generally Don Peters, Forever Jung:
Psychological Type Theory, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Learning
Negotiation, 42 Drake L. Rev. 1, nn.42-90 (1993); Marcin, supra note 17,
at 103-105. See also Carl G. Jung, Psychological Types (1921) reprinted
in 6 The Collected Works of C. G. Jung (William McGuire et al. eds. &
R.C.F. Hull trans., 1971).
56. FN56. See generally Mary H. McCaulley, Jung's
Theory of Psychological Types and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in Advances
in Personality Assessment (Paul M. Reynolds ed. 1981); Marcin, supra note
17.
57. FN57. Isabel Briggs Myers & Mary H. McCaulley,
Manual: A Guide to The Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
1 (1985).
58. FN58. Isabel Briggs Myers, Introduction to Type:
A Description of the Theory & Application of the Myers-Briggs Type
Indicator 5 (Allen L. Hammer ed., 4th ed. 1987).
59. FN59. Marie-Louise Von Franz & James Hillman,
Lectures on Jung's Typology 160 (1971); Daryl Sharp, Personality Types:
Jung's Model of Typology (1987).
60. FN60. Myers & McCaulley, supra note 57,
at 5.
61. FN61. Id. at 6.
62. FN62. Myers & McCaulley, supra note 57,
at 2.
63. FN63. See generally Jensen, supra note 51, at
182; Lawrence, supra note 50, at 15; Gordon D. Lawrence, People Types and
Tiger Stripes: A Practical Guide to Learning Styles (1982); Mary H. McCaulley
& Frank L. Natter, Psychological (Myers-Briggs) Type Differences in
Education (1974).
64. FN64. Jensen, supra note 51, at 181-83.
65. FN65. Id. at 182.
66. FN66. Id.
67. FN67. Id. at 183
68. FN68. Id.
69. FN69. See generally Leiden, supra note 18, at
395-401; Janice A. Nisbet et al., Predictors of Academic Success with High
Risk College Students, 23 J.C. Student Personnel 227-35 (1982); John G.
Bruhn, et al., Predictors of Academic Performance Among Physician Assistants,
8 The P.A. Journal 181-87 (1978). In fact, the MBTI has been widely used
in examining teaching, learning and academic aptitudes. Lawrence, supra
note 50, at 2.
70. FN70. Jensen, supra note 51, at 183. Many different
factors influence a student's actual behavior, including personality type,
parental influence, instruction, learning environment, and maturity. Id.
Consequently, a "perfect correlation between personality type and learning
style is not possible." Id.