The law of judicial remedies determines the nature and scope
of the relief to be given to a plaintiff once that plaintiff has established
a substantive right by appropriate in-court procedures. The two major
remedial questions are :
(1) what remedy or combination of
remedies can or should be awarded?
(2) what is the measure, or the
scope, of the remedy chosen?
Remedial rules that answer these questions point lawyers to proof
required in the same way that substantive rules do. For instance a rule
that measure damages for breach of a contract to sell a house by the
difference between the contract price and the market price of the house
tells the lawyer that she must prove both the contract price and the
market price. There are important difference between remedial and
substantive law." Dan Dobbs, Law on Remedies 1 (1993).
|
Introduction |
|
Class |
Name |
Suggested Readings |
Thurs
Aug 28 |
|
|
| Sept. 2 |
- 1.1 Perales v. Fenton
- 1.2 Benton v. Henderson
|
Dobbs, 1 - 47 |
| Sept. 4 |
-
1.3 Zamora Damson
-
1.5 Leary v. Langtree
|