Winter, 2004
Instructor: Michael H. Barnes, Humanities Bldg.
347 barnes@udayton.eduThis course is a Religious Studies Capstone course. It
is open only to Religious Studies majors and minors and to Berry
Scholars and honors students. (To be signed into the course see the
Religious Studies Chairperson, Dr. Yocum Mize, or Dr. Barnes.)
Brief description: a review and analysis of
alternative ideas about the nature, existence, and activity of God, with
some comparisons to ideas about the Ultimate in non-Western cultures.
The course will begin with ancient polytheism, some comparisons of
Ultimates in major world religions, and the refinement of Western
concepts of God over centuries. The second section of the course will
study the roots of modern atheism in deism and the subsequent growth of
both atheism and Christian responses to it. The third section will
examine a variety of 20th century responses to previous
developments as well as significant new approaches in theologies of
God.
(See below for the outline of the course in three
major segments, as well as
for the text, methods of evaluation (three exams and a paper), and mode
of instructions.)
The course will include three
major segments:
The Foundations
1. From polytheism to monotheism in
Hebrew history and equivalent movements in other world cultures
(Persian, Indian, Chinese).
2. The refinement of the concept of the divine unity and
activity among the Jews and then Christians, and later among Muslims
3. The medieval development of highly philosophical
arguments about the nature, existence, and activity of God, including
discussion of the absolute and ordained power of God.
The Beginning of the Modern Era
5. The development of deistic
interpretations of God, reliant upon arguments from design, and
critical of belief in divine intervention in history.
6. The emergence of modern atheism: Feuerbach, Marx,
Nietzsche, and Freud
7. The redefinition of God & divine activity in
liberal theology – Schleiermacher.
8. Neo-orthodox reaction, and Christian existentialism as
a further reaction.
9. Atheistic existentialism: Camus and Sartre
Twentieth Century
Developments (there may not be time for all of these)
10. The response of Transcendental Thomism –
Karl Rahner
11. Process theology, as in Charles Hartshorne
12. A feminist approach to God: Elizabeth Johnson
13. The black face of God: James Cone;
14. God for the oppressed: Gustavo Gutierrez
15. Semi-popular science-based atheism in the late 20th
century – Carl Sagan
16. The new arguments from design: anthropic principle &
Intelligent Design
17. Postmodern approaches to belief in God
Text:
There will be approximately 30 excerpts from various historical primary
sources, mostly on the webpage for the course, a few as handouts for the
course. In addition each student will have to select the relevant
sources for the students paper.
Evaluations
Essay exams: There will be 3 essay exams, one
at the end of each of the three major sections of the course.
Research Paper: There will also be a research
paper, of from 12-15 pages. This paper can be in one of two major forms.
Form #1: A critical comparison of some specific
position in the writings of any two major thinkers who differ
significantly from each other, along with some reading in secondary
sources as a guide. There are obviously significant differences
between any given atheist and any theist, but it is also legitimate to
investigate significant differences between two theists or two
atheists, where such significant differences exist.
Form #2: A critical survey of a few major positions
taken on a specific aspect of debates about God during some time
period. This should include the use of both primary sources and
secondary sources. This can be a "state of the question"
review of current ideas, if you choose.
Mode of instruction:
Seminar style, if the number of students enrolled
allows.
For each class, one person will be responsible for
summarizing a reading for that class. A second person will be
responsible for responding to the summary, offering any corrections or
other considerations needed, and initiating a discussion. These
assignments will rotate through the list of those enrolled.