

Augustine of Hippo
354-430
CE

Thomas Aquinas
1225-1274
|
|
CHAPTER 11 Believing and
Knowing: The Interrelations of Faith and Reason
Outline
Theology
Pre-theological Primitive and Archaic Traditions
Historic Religion Produces Theology
Systematic or Doctrinal Theology
Faith Seeking Understanding
E.g. #1: God, Evil, and Theodicy
E.g. #2: Making the Implausible Plausible
Natural Theology
By Reason Alone
Proving God's Existence by Reason Alone
The Argument from Design
The Argument by Definition and Logic
The Argument for an Uncaused Cause
The Philosopher's God
The God of Natural Theology as Personal
Symbols of the Divine
Faith and Reason
The Dangers of Reason
Faith without Reasoning
Faith as Reasonable Commitment
The Tensions of the Human Quest
Summary
INTRODUCTION
Most religious people today see a distinct division between faith and
reason. Faith can be a source for answers that reason cannot provide.
Though the two are different, many would argue
that their faith is at least partially reasonable.
THEOLOGY
Though primitive
people certainly wondered about the numinous realities, it was not until the axial age that people began to
seek to systematically organize and explain their beliefs and practices. This
attempt to explain religion “from the inside” developed into the
discipline of theology in historic traditions. Theology has the
double job of showing the internal coherence of the tradition as well as
its rational plausibility
SYSTEMATIC OR DOCTRINAL THEOLOGY
Systematic theology is
the name often given to theology that first presupposes that the religious
beliefs of its traditions are true, and then seeks to deepen the
understanding of their truth. This is sometimes called “faith
seeking understanding.” One example in attempt to resolve
"the problem of evil," which is to explain how evil can exist in a world
controlled by an all-good and all-powerful God. Each such attempt is
called a “theodicy.” Theology also seeks to
bring plausibility to religious beliefs that, considered independently,
might seem implausible.
NATURAL THEOLOGY
Natural theology seeks
to understand religious belief by reason alone. One
of the most important examples of natural theology is the attempt to prove
God’s existence. These proofs have taken three major
forms: the argument from design, the ontological argument,
and the cosmological argument.
The
Argument from Design
This line of reasoning is perhaps the most
popular. The extraordinarily
complex order of nature, some argue, must be due to an ordering Power.
Western religion further claims this Power must be a conscious intelligent
Designer.
The Argument by Definition and Logic
This argument, also known as the
“ontological” argument, claims that the definition of a Most Perfect Being
alone is enough to prove the existence of God. Because by definition
a Most Perfect
Being cannot not exist and cannot temporarily exist, it must exist by
"necessity."
The Argument for an Uncaused Cause
As used by Thomas Aquinas, this argues that
fundamental facts of the cosmos, its
activity, causal order, and even its very existence can only be accounted
for if there is an ultimate necessary Cause of everything, which people know as God.
The
God of Natural Theology as Personal
Natural Theology argues that God must
somehow possess the “personal” traits of
consciousness and freedom, albeit in an infinite and incomprehensible (to
us) manner. In addition, natural theology has legitimized
symbols of the divine with the realization that the Ultimate exceeds the
human grasp.
FAITH AND REASON
Some
believers are threatened by the work of theologians who analyze religious
ideas rationally. Such logical work can suggest that religious beliefs must live up to standards of
reason. Yet some types of belief ignore standards of reason.
Yet there may also be a hidden logic to some faith; or it may be a
reasonable commitment.
The
Tensions of the Human Quest
Our ability to reflect and question can
frustrate our search for security and stability.
End of notes to Chapter 11
This page last changed
Tuesday May 20, 2003
|
In The Presence of Mystery

Shankara 788-820
CE

Marjorie Suchocki
Claremont Graduate
School. Process
Theology
|