|
COMMITTEE FOR
THE ELIMINATION
OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
Sixty-
eighth
session
Geneva,
20 February – 10 March 2006
EARLY WARNING AND URGENT ACTION PROCEDURE
DECISION 1 (68)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
A. Introduction
1.
At its 67th session held from 2 to 19
August 2005, the Committee considered on a preliminary basis
requests submitted by the
Western Shoshone National Council, the Timbisha Shoshone Tribe, the
Winnemucca Indian Colony and the Yomba Shoshone Tribe, asking the
Committee to act under its early warning and urgent action
procedure on the situation of the
Western Shoshone indigenous
peoples in the United States of America.
2.
Considering that the opening of a dialogue with the
State party would assist in clarifying the situation before the
submission and examination of the fourth and fifth periodic reports
of the United States of America, due on 20 November 2003, the
Committee, in accordance with article 9 (1) of the Convention and
article 65 of its rules of procedure, invited the State party, in a
letter dated 19 August 2005, to respond to a list of questions, with
a view to considering this issue at its 68th session.
3.
Responding to the Committee’s letter, the State party, in its
letter dated 15 February 2006, stated that its overdue periodic
reports are being prepared and that they will include responses to
the list of issues. The Committee regrets
that the State party has not
undertaken to submit its periodic reports by a specific date,
that it has not provided responses to the list of issues by 31
December 2005 as requested, and that it did not consider it
necessary to appear before the Committee to discuss the matter.
4.
The Committee has received credible information alleging that
the Western Shoshone indigenous peoples are being denied their
traditional rights to land, and that measures taken and even
accelerated lately by the State party in relation to the status, use
and occupation of these lands may cumulatively lead to irreparable
harm to these communities. In light of such information, and in the
absence of any response from the State party, the Committee decided
at its 68th session to adopt the present decision under
its early warning and urgent action procedure. This procedure is
clearly distinct from the communication procedure under article 14
of the Convention. Furthermore, the nature and urgency of the issue
examined in this decision go well beyond the limits of the
communication procedure.
B.
Concerns
5.
The Committee expresses concern about the lack of action
taken by the State party to follow up on its previous concluding
observations, in relation to the situation of the Western Shoshone
peoples (A/56/18,
para. 400, adopted on 13 August 2001). Although these are
indeed long-standing issues, as stressed by the State party in its
letter, they warrant immediate and effective action from the State
party. The Committee therefore considers that this issue should be
dealt with as a matter of priority.
6.
The Committee is concerned by the State party’s position that
Western Shoshone peoples’ legal rights to ancestral lands have been
extinguished through gradual encroachment, notwithstanding the fact
that the Western Shoshone peoples have reportedly continued to use
and occupy the lands and their natural resources in accordance with
their traditional land tenure patterns. The Committee further notes
with concern that the State party’s position is made on the basis of
processes before the Indian Claims Commission, “which did not comply
with contemporary international human rights norms, principles and
standards that govern determination of indigenous property
interests”, as stressed by the Inter-American Commission on Human
Rights in the case Mary and Carrie Dann versus United States
(Case 11.140, 27 December 2002).
7.
The Committee is of the view that past and new actions taken
by the State party on Western Shoshone ancestral lands lead to a
situation where, today, the obligations of the State party under the
Convention are not respected, in particular the obligation to
guarantee the right of everyone to equality before the law in the
enjoyment of civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights,
without discrimination based on race, colour, or national or ethnic
origin. The Committee recalls its General recommendation 23 (1997)
on the rights of indigenous peoples, in particular their
right to own, develop, control and use their communal lands,
territories and resources, and expresses particular concern
about:
a)
Reported legislative efforts to privatize Western Shoshone
ancestral lands for transfer to multinational extractive industries
and energy developers
b)
Information according to which destructive activities are
conducted and/or planned on areas of spiritual and cultural
significance to the Western Shoshone peoples, who are denied access
to, and use of, such areas. It notes in particular the reinvigorated
federal efforts to open a nuclear waste repository at the Yucca
Mountain; the alleged use of explosives and open pit gold mining
activities on Mont Tenabo and Horse Canyon; and the alleged issuance
of geothermal energy leases at, or near, hot springs, and the
processing of further applications to that end.
c)
The reported resumption of underground nuclear testing on
Western Shoshone ancestral lands;
d)
The conduct and / or planning of all such activities without
consultation with and despite protests of the Western Shoshone
peoples;
e)
The reported intimidation and harassment of Western Shoshone
people by the State party’s authorities, through the imposition of
grazing fees, trespass and collection notices, impounding of horse
and livestock, restrictions on hunting, fishing and gathering, as
well as arrests, which gravely disturb the enjoyment of their
ancestral lands.
f)
The difficulties encountered by Western Shoshone peoples in
appropriately challenging all such actions before national courts
and in obtaining adjudication on the merits of their claims, due in
particular to domestic technicalities.
C.
Recommendations
8.
The Committee recommends to the State party that it respect
and protect the human rights of the Western Shoshone peoples,
without discrimination based on race, colour, or national or ethnic
origin, in accordance with the Convention. The State party is urged
to pay particular attention to the right to health and cultural
rights of the Western Shoshone people, which may be infringed upon
by activities threatening their environment and/or disregarding the
spiritual and cultural significance they give to their ancestral
lands.
9.
The Committee urges the State party to take immediate action
to initiate a dialogue with the representatives of the Western
Shoshone peoples in order to find a solution acceptable to them, and
which complies with their rights under, in particular, articles 5
and 6 of the Convention. In this regard also, the Committee draws
the attention of the State party to its General recommendation 23
(1997) on the rights of indigenous peoples, in particular
their right to own, develop,
control and use their communal lands, territories and resources.
10.
The Committee urges the State party to adopt the following
measures until a final decision or settlement is reached on the
status, use and occupation of Western Shoshone ancestral lands in
accordance with due process of law and the State party’s obligations
under the Convention:
a)
Freeze any plan to privatize Western Shoshone ancestral lands
for transfer to multinational extractive industries and energy
developers;
b)
Desist from all activities planned and/or conducted on the
ancestral lands of Western Shoshone or in relation to their natural
resources, which are being carried out without consultation with and
despite protests of the Western Shoshone peoples;
c)
Stop imposing grazing fees, trespass and collection notices,
horse and livestock impoundments, restrictions on hunting, fishing
and gathering, as well as arrests, and rescind all notices already
made to that end, inflicted on Western Shoshone people while using
their ancestral lands.
11.
In accordance with article 9 (1) of the Convention, the
Committee requests that the State party provide it with information
on action taken to implement the present decision by 15 July 2006.
|