Traduzca esta página, Traduisez cette page,  Traduza esta página
    from

  Guest book! 
Survey: Race Relations
Upcoming Book: Dying While Black:
Community Summit

Race, Racism and the Law 
Speaking Truth to Power!!

 

  LSAC Good Practices

Vernellia R. Randall
Professor of Law and
Web Editor

Submit for Periodic Updates
Update List

 

 

 
What's New
Law Review Articles

Awards and Recognitions
Sign Guest book!
Survey: Race Relations in the United States
 
Chapters
Race and Racial Groups
Citizenship Rights
Justice and Race
Patterns of Basic Needs
Intersectionality Issues
Worldwide Issues
 
Syllabi
Race and Racism
 
Surveys
Race Relations
Who is White?
Social Contact
Want Monthly Updates?
Send me your email:


Preferred Language of Updates: 

Favorite Poetry
Invictus
The Bridge Poem
Still I Rise
No Struggle No Progress
1 Corinthians 1-13
Lift E'vry Voice
St. Assisi
 
Related Websites
Race and Health Care
Gender and the Law
Legal Education
Personal Homepage

 

 

 Editor Note: Good practices directly related to the use of LSAT are hightlighted in red.

LSAC Statement of Good Admission and Financial Aid Practices


Summary

To promote fairness for all participants in the law school admission and financial aid processes by encouraging the highest standards of professional conduct, all law school admission and financial aid offices should:

A. Avoid impropriety and conflicts of interest and uphold the integrity of the admission and financial aid processes.

B. Provide candid current data about applicants' prospects for admission, financial aid, completing the degree program. and employment

1. Law schools have an oversight role and are responsible for the representations of all individuals involved in recruitment and promotion of their school. All representatives, including graduates, faculty, and students, are obligated to be informed about relevant programs, procedures. financial aid, job opportunities for graduates, standards, and policies of the school.

2. Recruitment activities should not include unreasonable and unfounded Comparisons with other law schools. It is unreasonable and unfounded to use rankings to compare the quality of your law school with other law schools.

3. Publications, videos, and electronic communications of a law school should be current and accurate in all respects. Application materials should contain admission and financial aid information and deadlines

4. Prelaw advisors and others who counsel applicants should be provided with accurate and current information.

C. Establish and maintain a fair, coherent, and consistent admission process, inform applicants about it, respect their confidentiality, and observe relevant laws and guidelines such as the Cautionary Policies Concerning Use of the LSAT

1. Make it clear to applicants what is required in the admission process, including deadlines, and the consequences of providing late, incomplete, false, or misleading information (which includes referral to the LSAC Subcommittee on Misconduct and Irregularities In the Admission Process).

2. Require applicants to submit an application and complete all admission procedures before making an admission offer.

3. In making admission decisions, consider various criteria such as academic record, LSAT, letters of recommendation, personal statements, work experience, and diversity Do not give undue weight to the LSAT.

4. Offer equal opportunity to applicants who are members of cultural, ethnic, or racial groups who would not be otherwise meaningfully represented in the entering class.

5. Make reasonable accommodations to the needs of disabled applicants in the admission process.

6. Scrupulously maintain the privacy of applicants and release individually identifiable information only to those with legitimate interests such as admission and financial aid personnel.

D. Disclose to incoming transfer applicants the programmatic implications of transferring, such as law review status, financial aid eligibility, and course requirements.

E. Promptly inform applicants of admission and financial aid decisions

1. Observe the April 1 common applicant response date that allows applicants to freely choose among offers of admission, scholarships, grants, and Loans without pena1ty for fall matriculation. The sole exception is for applicants who have applied under a bona fide early decision plan. A bona fide early decision plan is an agreement between the applicant and the school that, if admitted by December 15, the applicant withdraw all pending applications and not initiate new ones.

2. Disclose to a wait listed app1icant wait list procedures such as submitting additional material, the likely timing of an admission decision; and other information fairly determined to permit the applicant to make an informed choice on other opportunities.

F. Admissions and financial aid professionals have an obligation to provide applicants with clear, accurate and complete information about institutional and federal finania1 aid policies, requirements, and availability.

1. Provide information on cost of attendance that accurately reflects reasonable and current coats, and which includes information on average debt load and debt management

2. Provide all applicants with information about policies and procedures for applying for and appealing financial aid awards.

3. Notify the applicant of financial aid awards that are within the control of the law school prior to requiring a nonrefundable financial commitment

 

Traduzca esta página, Traduisez cette page,  Traduza esta página
    from

Please Sign My Guest book!      Read My Guestbook
Survey: Race Relations in the United States
Upcoming Book: Dying While Black: Using Reparation to Eliminate the "Slave Health Deficit"
Durban to Dayton: Community Summit on Eliminating Racism
Same level:
LSAT USNEWS and Minority Admissions ] LSAT Discrimination and Minorities ] Discrimination in Law School Admission ] InEfficient Racism of the ABA ] LSAT Magnifies Differences in Educational Attainment ] Defending the Use of Quota's in Law Schools ] Assessing Stagnant Enrollment of Blacks in Law Schools ] StatementLSATBrochure.pdf ] LSAC Cautionary Policies re Use of LSAT ] LSA Practices.pdf ] LSAC letter.pdf ] Scorebands.pdf ] [ LSAC Good Practices ] Law School Admission Factors ] A History of MInorities in Legal Education ] LSAC Bar Passage Study ] Selected Readings on LSAT and Minority Admission ]
Child Level:
Home ] Up ]
Parent Level:
Admission To Law School ] BarExamination ] The Whitest Law Schools ]
Units:
[Race and Racial Groups] [Citizenship Rights]  [Justice and Race] [Patterns of Basic Needs] [Intersectionality Issues] [Human Rights]

 

Always Under Construction!

Always Under Construction!

Copyright @ 2004. 
Vernellia Randall. All Rights Reserved
Contact: race.mail@notes.udayton.edu

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, some material on this website is provided for comment, background information, research and/or educational purposes only, without permission from the copyright owner(s), under the "fair use" provisions of the federal copyright laws. These materials may not be distributed for other purposes without permission of the copyright owner(s)


Thanks to Derrick Bell and his pioneer work: 
Race, Racism and American Law
(1993).