This site is no longer being
maintained at this location.


This section of the site Basic Needs has been moved to

Http://racism.org

 

  UNITS
Institutional Racism                                         X
01 Race and Racial Groups                                x
02 Citizenship Rights                                    x
03 Justice                                            x
04 Basic Needs                                             x
05 Intersectionality                                           x
06 Worldwide                                           x
   
   
  Web Editor:
  Vernellia R. Randall
Professor of Law
The University of Dayton
Web Editor
                                          
   
  OTHER WEBSITES
Race and Health Care
Personal Website                                          x
Legal Education
The JD Project

 

 Laura M. Padilla

excerpted from: Laura M. Padilla, Intersectionality And Positionality: Situating Women of Color in The Affirmative Action Dialogue, 66 Fordham Law Review 843, 853-885 (December, 1997)(432 footnotes omitted)

The fourth myth is that affirmative action stigmatizes beneficiaries. Critics claim that affirmative action results in continued negative stereotypes of beneficiaries and causes self-doubt and low self-esteem among those beneficiaries who believe they have attained their positions because of affirmative action. For most beneficiaries, this is simply inaccurate--no evidence exists that the majority of affirmative action beneficiaries are stigmatized.

Even if there is some truth to the stigma criticism for occasional beneficiaries, for women of color who have been conditioned to feel low self- esteem and self doubt, the experience is hardly novel. For example, I have spoken with many women of color about their law school experiences of attending class, hearing a professor say something demeaning about women of color, noticing no reaction among their classmates, and ultimately wondering, "Is it just me?" To illustrate, at a conference at Harvard Law School organized by the Women of Color Collective, when one panelist described the "is it just me" phenomenon, women throughout the audience nodded their heads in understanding.

To the extent there is self-doubt or stigma among women of color, there are many explanations other than, or in addition to, affirmative action. For example, women of color already may lack confidence because of family upbringing or cultural or social conditioning, regardless of the existence of affirmative action. Furthermore, many women of color have been treated with disrespect and the expectation that they will not succeed-- too often self-fulfilling prophecies. A large percentage of women of color enter traditional occupations such as housecleaning, childcare, and other service/servant types of jobs. There are few women who look like them in positions of power or looking after them and their interests. These factors are much more likely to cause low self-esteem or stigma than affirmative action, which could give them a boost out of the colored feminization of poverty.

Regardless of affirmative action, women of color's qualifications are often suspect in the eyes of their colleagues or peers. Until we truly have a color-blind society, however, people will always wonder whether women of color qualify for positions. Women of color often have to work harder just to get the respect that their white male colleagues enjoy as a birth right. The presumption favoring white males seems to be that they are qualified until they prove otherwise. With women of color, the presumption seems to be that they are unqualified until they prove otherwise.

Blacks and whites must face the fact that affirmative action has made no significant difference in the way whites look at blacks. Competent and successful blacks are still seen as exceptional. Before and since affirmative action, most white people see another white as competent until proven incompetent and a black person as incompetent until proved competent. Thus, there is little risk that affirmative action would wound our self-esteem to the point of disabling us, and it certainly would not be the worst wound we have borne. We would welcome some open doors even with the potential accompanying "stigma risk." This risk is much more attractive than joblessness or low paying work. Furthermore, any stigma- attached downside to affirmative action does not outweigh the upside of providing opportunities for women of color that would not otherwise exist.

Myth: Women of Color Double Dips
Myth: Women of Color Double-Dip From Affirmative Action
Myth: Justified Only Under a Perpetrator-Victim Model
Myth: Affirmative Action Beneficiaries are Stigmatized
Myth: Affirmative Action Disregards Low-Income Persons
 
 
Submit for Periodic Updates
Update List
 
CHAPTERS
Affirmative Action                                            x
Education                                           x
Economic Issues                                           x
Employment                                            x
Environmental Racism                                           x
Family and Adoption                                           x
Health Care                                            x
Media                                            x
Poverty and Welfare                                           x
Property and Housing                                           x
Protest and Protection                                            x
Public Facilities                                           x
Sex and Marriage                                           x
Voting Rights                                            x
Miscellaneous                                           x
 
   
   
OTHER PAGES
What's New!                                           x
Obama's Administration                             x
Webinars                                                x
The Whitest Law Schools                                           x
Law Reviews                                           x
Newsletter                                           x
Racial Surveys                                           x
Awards                                           x
Syllabus                                           x
Search this Site                                           x
Contact                                           x
 

 

Same level:
Myth: Women of Color Double Dips ] Myth: Women of Color Double-Dip From Affirmative Action ] Myth: Justified Only Under a Perpetrator-Victim Model ] [ Myth: Affirmative Action Beneficiaries are Stigmatized ] Myth: Affirmative Action Disregards Low-Income Persons ]
Child Level:
Home ] Up ]
Parent Level:
Parents Involved in Community Schools V. Seattle School District No. 1 and Race-conscious Student Assignment Policies ] Recasting MLK as an Affirmative Action Opponent ] Higher Education Admissions  Compliance Manual ] FOR WHITES ONLY - A Long History of Affirmative Action ] Mandatory Affirmative Action ] How Affirmative Action Helped George W. ] Bakke and the Causation Fallacy ] Is Affirmative Action Still Needed? ] Is Affirmative Action Still Needed? ] Color Blinded by Whiteness ] The Need for Affirmative Action- Strong as Ever! ] I am an Affirmative Action Baby! ] Merit and Affirmative Action ] My Word's Worth - Affirmative Action ] Innocent Whites and Colorblindness ] Adding Salt To The Wound ] Grutter v. Bollinger ] Asian Americans and Affirmative Actions ] The Evolution Of Race In The Law ] Affirmative Action and the Law ] The Pre-Affirmative Action Era ] Diminished Self Worth ] Anglo-Irish American Observation on Affirmative Action ] Sameness does not Mean Fairness ] Meritocracy and Diversity ] Affirmative Action Based On Economic Disadvantage ] Affirmative Action Backlash or Debunking the Myths ] Chicana/o Desegregation Cases ] Asian Americans and 1996 California Civil Rights Initiative ] Whites Swim in Racial Preference ] White Women and Affirmative Action ]
Units:
[Race and Racial Groups] [Citizenship Rights]  [Justice and Race] [Patterns of Basic Needs] [Intersectionality Issues] [Human Rights]

 

Always Under Construction!

Always Under Construction!

Copyright @ 1997, 2008.
Vernellia R. Randall

All Rights Reserved.

 

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, some material on this website is provided for comment, background information, research and/or educational purposes only, without permission from the copyright owner(s), under the "fair use" provisions of the federal copyright laws. These materials may not be distributed for other purposes without permission of the copyright owner(s).


Last Updated:
Wednesday, April 25, 2012  

You are visitor number
Hit Counter    
Since Sept. 11, 2001

Thanks to Derrick Bell and his pioneer work: 
Race, Racism and American Law
(1993).