This site is no longer being
maintained at this location.


This section of the site Worldwide is being moved to

Http://racism.org

 

 

 

UNITS
Intro: Institutional Racism
01 Race and Racism                                        x
02 Citizenship Rights                                       x
03 Justice                                       x
04 Basic Needs                                       x
05 Intersectionality                                        x
06 Worldwide                                        x

 
  Web Editor:
  Vernellia R. Randall
Professor of Law
The University of Dayton
Web Editor
   
  OTHER WEBSITES
Personal Website                                     x
Race and Health                                     x
The Whitest Law Schools                                     x
 

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION AGAINST TORTURE (IAAT-AICT)  ASOCIACION INTERNACIONAL CONTRA LA TORTURA (AICT),  P.O. BOX 693  - Lincolnton Station,  New York, NY 10037,  (718) 230-5270 (tel) - (718) 230-5273 (fax),  AICT1@aol.com

 

DECEMBER 12th MOVEMENT INTERNATIONAL SECRETARIAT, 456 Nostrand Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11216, USA, (718) 398-1766 (tel) - (718) 623-1855 (fax),  D12M@aol.com (e-mail)

 

 

WCAR Review Conference
Palais des Nations, Geneva, Switzerland
23 April 2009

 

To the Chair:

            The December 12th Movement International Secretariat and the International Association Against Torture make this joint intervention to provide some critical perspective on the Outcome Document to the Review of the World Conference against Racism.

 

Organizational Background:

            Both our organizations were involved in the process of requesting and then organizing for the World Conference against Racism (WCAR). At the World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna, 1993, we called for a WCAR and then lobbied for it over the next four years. After the General Assembly passed the 1997 resolution setting the WCAR in 2001, we began organizing both nationally and internationally around three issues which we believed spoke to the essence of racism and its resolution: i) recognition of the economic bases of racism; ii) a declaration of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade, Slavery and Colonialism as Crimes against Humanity; iii) a demand that compensation/reparations were due the descendants of the victims of these crimes.

            Our organizations, along with the National Black United Front (NBUF), brought a group of 400 members from across the African Diaspora to Durban. “The Durban 400’s” focus was on lobbying states and regional groupings around the three issues and our efforts played a role in the development of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action (DDPA)

 

Outcome Document

            By its simple affirmation of support for the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, the Outcome Document represents a victory for African people - the victims until Durban I of internationally denied crimes against humanity. On the other hand, the Outcome Document deals a crushing defeat to the WEO (Western European and Other) Group who fought tenaciously and opportunistically to erase Durban I and its advances from the memory of the international community. These advances included: acknowledgment of the economic basis of racism; declaration of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade and Slavery as Crimes against Humanity; declaration that the descendants of the victims of these crimes were due reparations (compensation).

            The authority of the 183 countries which approved the Outcome Document far outweigh the impact of the futile attempt to discredit the DDPA and Durban II by the cowardly withdrawal of a handful of countries. It is no coincidence that most of those countries which left were the principal perpetrators and/or beneficiaries of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade and Slavery. Their furtive retreat was an unsuccessful effort to avoid: i) in the particular, their historical obligation to pay reparations to the descendants of the victims of their criminal activity; and ii) in the general, exposure and criticism of the fact that between 2001-2009 they had taken no actions at all to fulfill their commitments to the DDPA.

 

A Brief History

            These latest attempts by WEO to avoid international condemnation of and the demand to pay reparations for its racist, white supremacist, colonial history are not new

            * WEO unsuccessfully attempted to remove Racism as a Commission on Human Rights agenda item shortly after the dismantling of apartheid in South Africa.

            * WEO resisted calling for a World Conference against Racism and Racial Discrimination until the rest of the world agreed to dilute the focus on white supremacy by expanding its mandate to include “Xenophobia and All Forms of Related Intolerance.”

            *  WEO applied unrelenting pressure prior to and during the Durban World Conference, trying to force the African Group to drop the language declaring the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade and Slavery as a Crime Against Humanity” and recognition of the rights to reparations for the victims’ descendants.

            *  WEO took the unprecedented step of trying to reopen the DDPA after the World Conference had ended in an attempt to erase the language cited above

            *  WEO lobbied against a Durban +5 follow-up, the standard procedure for every World Conference held since the 1990s.

            * WEO opposed holding this 5 day WCAR Review.

            *  WEO threatened to boycott this WCAR Review unless the essence of the DDPA was so  diluted as to have no significance.

 

Reparations, Economics and the Right to Development


     WEO has conducted a massive propaganda campaign to discredit the concept of Reparations for People of African Descent by framing it solely in terms of money. The demand for reparations is, in the first instance, a demand to repair the damage done by criminal activity; to make the victims whole and to implement their human right to development. The demand for reparations is a call to eradicate the economic exploitation and inequality which are the roots of racism. It is a demand for the provision of and direction of sufficient resources to allow the unhindered development of the African-descendant collectivities of underdevelopment created by racism.

 

Conclusion

            The Outcome Document is an important step in the process of the international community breaking with the old, colonial, 20th century way of doings things. The UN’s largest donors, i.e. WEO can no longer hold the majority of humanity hostage because it refuses to be accountable to the same human rights standards it demands the rest of the world adhere to.

We propose the following immediatesteps:

* Preparation to begin now for the convening of Durban +10;

* Establishment of a Permanent UN Forum on People of African Descent;

* Provision of Reparations to the descendants of the victims of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade and Slavery.

            We have not fallen for the diversions, i.e. baseless allegations that criticism of Zionism = Anti-Semitism; that withdrawal by some countries will discredit the Review Process. We salute those countries, e.g. Zimbabwe, Tanzania, Barbados, Cuba which have expressed support for reparations during this week. We emerge  re-energized and even more committed to rekindling the spirit of the Durban 400 and achieving our demand for reparations. Thank you.

 
 

Last Updated:
Saturday, May 02, 2009  

You are visitor number
Hit Counter  
Since  March, 2009

Submit for Periodic Updates
Update List

CHAPTERS
GeoPolitical Regions                                     x
Victim Groups                                     x
War on Terrorism                                      x
UN Human Rights                                      x
WCAR2001                                     x
 
 
 
Same level:
Draft of Durban Review ] Geneva 2009 Civil Society Declaration Against Racism ] United States Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Statement to Durban Review ] Recommendations Regarding People of African Descent in the United States ] NCBL Statement to Durban Review ] Sons and Daughters of Africa Statement to UN Durban Review ] Congressional Black Caucus Should Attend ] Durban Review (Revised Draft 02-2009) ] NBA Letter to Obama Administration ] Joint Statements of Dutch NGO Regarding African Descendants in the Netherlands ] African Diasporan NGO’s Declare Victory at Opening of Durban II ] Refusal to Attend = Admission of Guilt! ] [ Item 9 on the Agenda: Critique of Outcome Document of the Durban Review Process ] Ahmadinejad’s Speech at the Durban Review ] Israel,  Geneva  and the "Hate fest" against Black and Brown ]
Child Level:
Home ] Up ]
Parent Level:
Report on Americas Preparatory Conference ] Institutional Racism in the US Health Care System ] Joint Statement to America Prepcom ] NGO Forum Declaration and Programme of Action ] WCAR Declaration and Programme of Action ] WCAR Passages Specifically Addressing African and African Descendants ] Durban Review ]
Units:
[Race and Racial Groups] [Citizenship Rights]  [Justice and Race] [Patterns of Basic Needs] [Intersectionality Issues] [Human Rights]

 

Always Under Construction!

Always Under Construction!

Copyright @ 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001. Vernellia R. Randall
All Rights Reserved.

 

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, some material on this website is provided for comment, background information, research and/or educational purposes only, without permission from the copyright owner(s), under the "fair use" provisions of the federal copyright laws. These materials may not be distributed for other purposes without permission of the copyright owner(s).



Last Updated:
Wednesday, April 25, 2012  

You are visitor number
Hit Counter  
Since Sept. 11, 2001  


Thanks to Derrick Bell and his pioneer work: 
Race, Racism and American Law
(1993).