Virginia Courts Protects Cross Burnings
 

                   Complete Survey:  Race Relations 2011

 

Home Up Invitation to a Cross Burning Virginia Courts Protects Cross Burnings U.S. Supreme Court Protects Cross Burning

 Nov. 3, 2001
Court protects cross burning
by Jean McNair The Associated Press

(Richmond, Va.) -- A sharply divided Virginia Supreme Court struck down a state law against cross-burning Friday, saying such acts of bigotry are a protected form of speech.

In a 4-3 ruling, the court threw out the convictions of three people in two cases. One involved the burning of a cross at a Ku Klux Klan rally; the other involved an attempted burning in the back yard of a black person.

"Under our system of government, people have the right to use symbols to communicate. They patriotically wave the flag or burn it in protest; they may reverently worship the cross or burn it as an expression of bigotry," Justice Donald W. Lemons said.

"While reasonable prohibitions upon time, place and manner of speech, and statutes of neutral application, may be enforced, government may not regulate speech based on hostility--or favoritism--towards the underlying message expressed."

In dissent, Justice Leroy Hassell wrote that the law "for almost 50 years has protected our citizens from being placed in fear of bodily harm by the burning of a cross."

Prosecutors had argued that the law, which carried up to five years in prison and a fine of $2,500, was constitutional because it applied equally to anyone who burned a cross to intimidate someone.

Attorney General Randolph A. Beales said he will appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In one of the cases decided Friday, Barry Elton Black of Johnstown, Pa., was convicted in 1999 for leading a Klan ceremony in southwest Virginia that ended in a cross being set on fire. The case drew national attention when the American Civil Liberties Union hired a black lawyer, David P. Baugh, to defend Black.

Baugh argued that the ban violated the constitutional right of free speech, no matter how repugnant that speech might be. Black was fined $2,500.

In the other case, from Virginia Beach, Richard J. Elliott and Jonathan O'Mara were convicted of trying to set a cross ablaze in the yard of Elliott's neighbor, who is black. Each was fined $2,500 and sentenced to 90 days in jail. The men were drinking with a group of people when the conversation turned to complaints about the neighbor. The group built a crude cross that Elliott and O'Mara tried to ignite.

"As offensive as cross burning is, it is clearly protected expression under the First Amendment," said Virginia ACLU director Kent Willis. "The same constitutional right that allows you to burn the flag or criticize the government also allows you to express your opinions, as offensive as they may be."