MILITARY PERSONNEL AND DOMESTIC TERRORISM:
EXTENT OF INVOLVEMENT AND EFFECTS
From LCDR Steven Mack Presley, MSC, USN, Rise of
Domestic Terrorism and Its Relation to United States Armed Forces (April
19, 1996)
Various recent events, most particularly the bombing of the Federal
Building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma in April, 1995, and the racially
motivated murders of two civilians by active-duty United States Army
personnel in Fayetteville, North Carolina in December, 1995, have
focused the attention and suspicion of both military and civilian
authorities on the possibility that extremist and potentially
terroristic elements have established themselves within the Armed Forces
of our country. Organized extremist/terrorist groups of particular
concern with regard to their abilities to recruit from, and exist within
the United States armed services have historically been racist and/or
anti-government in character. Although preliminary investigations by law
enforcement agencies, both civilian and military, following the
Fayetteville murders, have been able to identify only a very few
military personnel actually associated with such groups, some such
people have been found. The potential threat to readiness, good order
and discipline posed by even a few such personnel should be considered
significant.(1) The significant detrimental impact these elements might
pose to unit morale, cohesiveness and their ability to be employed
efficiently are not the only factors that should be considered. The
potential threat of, and actual theft of weapons, ordinance and supplies
can be equally as damaging to a unit's efficiency and morale.
This paper will review the historical and contemporary trends of
domestic terrorism within the United States as a means of establishing
the similarities that exist between domestic extremist/terrorist groups
of yesteryear and today. I will then discuss the ways in which military
personnel may be influenced, involved or utilized by extremist and /or
terrorist organizations or groups in pursuing and accomplishing their
ultimate goals through these service members. Additionally, the current
threats and evolving characteristics of domestic extremist and terrorist
groups and their impact on military personnel and the military
"establishment" as a whole are discussed. A survey of
approximately 175 mid-grade military officers, predominantly United
States Marine Corps Majors, was conducted to determine the perceptions
and attitudes common among such a cohort regarding the threats posed to
"civilian and military authority" by contemporary extremist
and terrorist groups. Particular emphasis is placed on discussing the
two most significant extremist and/or terrorist threats facing America
today, the first being the racial hate-groups and racial supremacists,
and the second most significant rising threat is that of
anti-government, ultra right-wing separatists and state's-rights armed
militia groups. A major point of concern that must be considered in
delineating these groups along these lines, is the ever-increasing
"blur" that is developing between and among these groups. Many
of the ultra right-wing groups are also racial supremacists, as well as
religious extremists, and are thereby able to recruit from and influence
a larger portion of the population.
In a free, democratic society such as ours the First Amendment
freedoms of thought and speech are among those most cherished by the
citizenry, whether serving their country in the military or as a
civilian. The recent incidents of domestic terrorism and widespread
vocal and printed rhetoric of hate-groups motivated by racism, religious
intolerance, anti-government, or anarchist views have awakened many
Americans, including leaders in government and military service, to the
reality that "freedom isn't free", and that to solve these
problems we must first acknowledge and attempt to understand them. |