Kevin Abourezk
Reznet News
(http://www.reznetnews.org)
Much like an abusive spouse
wanting forgiveness for years of
abuse, the U.S. Senate has taken
up consideration of a formal
apology to Native people for
their deplorable treatment at
the hands of the federal
government.
But like the abusive spouse —
whose words are so often hollow
and lacking the necessary action
needed to ensure real change —
the apology the U.S. Senate is
considering carries no weight,
no real promise of reform.
Only more rhetoric.
The Indian apology is part of
a Senate resolution introduced
by Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan.,
and is attached as an amendment
to the Indian Health Care
Improvement Act. The Senate is
expected to take up debate on
the act again Monday.
Without binding reform
measures or the weight of a
sitting president behind it, the
apology not only lacks substance
but also the chorus of support
needed to truly make it the
first step toward healing
between Native people and the
U.S. government.
But what if a sitting
president were to support such
an apology?
It's not likely President
Bush, who opposes passage of the
Indian Health Care Improvement
Act and recently proposed
slashing funding to many Indian
social programs in his annual
budget, would ever support
anything resembling a concession
to Native people.
Of course Bush won't be
inhabiting the White House much
longer.
So what of the next
president?
Only three viable
presidential candidates remain
in the race. All of them — Sen.
John McCain (R-Ariz.), Sen.
Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and Sen.
Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) — have
voiced support for Native issues
during their time in the Senate.
And while it's safe to assume
the eventual Democratic nominee
would support an apology to
Native people, what about the
Republican nominee? Certainly
the relationship between
conservatives and Native people
has been a tempestuous one.
That said, McCain could be
the first Republican president
in a long time to take steps to
correct that dysfunctional
relationship.
In a May 2005 interview with
the Associated Press, McCain
said he supported a resolution
the Senate was considering at
that time that also would have
issued a formal apology to
Indians.
"Reviewing the history of
this government's treatment of
Native peoples makes painfully
obvious that the government has
repeatedly broken its promises
and caused great harm to the
nation's original inhabitants,"
McCain told the AP back then.
With the presumptive
Republican presidential nominee
having expressed support for an
Indian apology in recent years,
the chances the next president
would support such an apology
seem increasingly likely.
The idea of a president
standing before the entire world
and acknowledging this country's
mistreatment of its first
inhabitants is inspiring.
If that were to happen, it
would change this hollow apology
now being considered into
something more. Something likely
to elicit hope within even the
most cynical of us.
And while it still would ring
hollow without immediate action
toward real reform, it could
light a fire.
And that fire could, finally,
give form and substance to this
promise of change.
Kevin
Abourezk, Oglala Lakota, is a
reporter and editor at the
Lincoln (Neb.) Journal Star. He
is a reznet assignment editor
and teaches reporting at the
Freedom Forum's American Indian
Journalism Institute.