2/12/08 Lexington Herald Leader
Democrats need to understand that racism and sexism still
count in elections
When all the chess pieces are lined up, who is really best suited to beat
John McCain? Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, the white woman or the black
Both come with baggage -- hers attached to her gender, his to his skin color
-- that has nothing to do with their ability to govern. Sorry, but race and
gender do still count, even in a day when many of us wish they did not. And
there will be a point when many a voter will enter the voting booth, away
from glaring eyes or politically correct drumbeats, and cast a vote that
will be influenced at least in part by gender and race.
It's no head-scratcher to figure out why Clinton garnered more female voters
and Obama more African Americans on Super Tuesday.
In the final primary weeks, Democrats should ask themselves this question:
Is the United States more prone to racism or to sexism? And how should the
answer affect party strategy if the goal is a Democratic White House.
I vote sexist. Clinton haters are much more numerous and vocal than those
who can't stomach the idea of a black man globetrotting for the next four
years on Air Force One.
It's ironic that women got the vote more than four decades before blacks
were effectively enfranchised, yet it is only now that either women or
blacks are getting a chance to elect one of their own to the highest office
in the land. It's more ironic still that the black candidate may have a
better chance of overcoming prejudice and actually winning the presidency.
True, the hardcore racists do not care if Obama is half-black, 10 drops or
dark as coal. But, then, those folks weren't going to vote Democratic in the
first place. No doubt Obama has a security detail unequaled by any other
presidential candidate. I'd lay money he has had death threats that no other
candidate, including Clinton, could match. All due to his skin color.
So far, the only racially inspired scrutiny Obama has faced was early on,
when many African Americans were wondering, "Is he black enough?"
That skepticism actually helped Obama among some white voters. Not receiving
an unqualified stamp of approval from black political leaders right away
signaled that Obama was not pursuing politics as usual. And if, for a while,
African Americans wondered if he could represent their interests, the
consensus now seems to be "close enough."
John Edwards' white male supporters seemed to be crossing into the Obama
camp on Super Tuesday. He's turning into a bit of an everyman's candidate, a
political chameleon. The black/white swirl choice, with a nice topping of
Clinton doesn't have such flexibility in her image. She is a second version
of her husband, former President Bill Clinton. And he is a man who still
goads Republicans enough to drive them to vote, simply to be against a
Finally, Hillary Clinton was not whining to note early in her campaign that
she was taking extra flak for her femininity or lack thereof. It remains
more excusable to say rude things about women in public than it does to cast
Ask Don Imus. He managed to crudely slam the Rutgers women's basketball team
based on their gender and their race in one verbal assault. But the strength
of the backlash was largely fueled by the fact the young women were black.
Hillary Clinton was scrutinized for possibly showing cleavage, accused of
crying on cue and chastised for wearing too much color (and too little) and
pantsuits instead of skirts.
Petty drivel, all of it. No male candidate would ever be put under such a
Meanwhile, the Republicans are eating their own. John McCain might start
sounding more pious to engage conservative Republicans. But if he reaches
too far, he'll turn off the independents likely to take a chance on Obama's
message of bipartisan cooperation.
The United States might be ready to elect a woman, just not this one.
Especially not when the alternative option -- Obama -- continues to hold his
Heck of a mirror this 2008 Presidential campaign is holding up to America.