[APPROVED 10-13-06]
UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON
DAYTON, OHIO
MINUTES
OF THE ACADEMIC SENATE
September
15, 2006
KU
331, 3:00 p. m.
Senators Present: A. Abueida, J. Biddle, D. Biers
(presiding), M. Brill, L. Brislin, C. Chen, D. Courte, A. Crow, D. Darrow, G.
DeMarco, G. Doyle, C. Duncan, T. Eggemeier, E. Elam, J. Farrelly, A. Fist, E.
Gustafson, B. John, P. Johnson, T. Lasley, C. Letavec, W. Luckett, D. Parker,
R. Penno, F. Pestello, C. Phelps, D. Poe, A. Seielstad, R. Wells
Senators Excused: R. Hardie, L. Kloppenberg, P.
Meyers, I. Morgan, M. Morton, J. O'Gorman, J.
Saliba, M. Schmitz, L. Simmons, B. Turk
Guests: D. Bickford, M.
Patterson (Faculty Board), J. Untener,
1. Opening Prayer: Senator Gustafson opened the meeting with a
prayer focused on remembering the obligations of duty.
2. Roll Call: Twenty-nine of
thirty-nine Senators were present.
3. Minutes:
April
21, 2006: Moved and seconded, minutes
were approved as written.
4. Announcements:
Senator Biers announced a
number of transitions in the membership of the Academic Senate. Barbara John is replacing Monalisa Mullins;
Daren Parker is replacing Sandy Singer; Matt Schmitz is the graduate student
representative; Laura Brislin is the Humanities student representative. After the meeting he also confirmed that
James Farrelly is replacing Pamela Thimmes.
5. Open Faculty Forum :
As announced at the Fall
Faculty Meeting (September 8, 2006), the first part of the meeting of the
Academic Senate was made available for any faculty who wished to raise
questions about the proposed amendment to the Constitution of the Academic
Senate to do so. The proposal is
outlined in DOC 06-05 and involves changing the timing of elections and terms
for faculty, instructional staff, and student representatives of the Academic
Senate. There were no questions. Voting will begin on Monday, September 18,
and will continue through 4:30 PM on Monday, September 25, 2007. For the amendment to succeed at least 50% of
the tenured faculty (n=220) must vote and at least 2/3 of those voting must
favor the amendment.
6. Major Action items for the 2006-2007 Academic
Year:
- Senator Biers announced that the Provost has forwarded the report
of the Marianist Working Group, “Habits of Inquiry and Reflection: A Report on Education in the Catholic
and Marianist Traditions at the University
of Education.” The Provost has requested, on behalf of
the Provost Council, that the Senate evaluate the report to determine if
it captures the goals of education for a Catholic and Marianist
university. He requests that this
evaluation include broad campus discussion of the document’s mission
statement, educational aims, and core learning outcomes. If the campus is supportive of these, he
further requests that the Academic Senate take appropriate action to
generate a set of specific recommendations regarding specific programs,
infrastructure, faculty development, and resources necessary to realize
educational aims and learning outcomes.
Biers indicated that ECAS has had preliminary discussions of
assignment of the document and will probably assign the document to all
three standing committees. He also
noted that there is no time table attached to the Provost charge. Senator Doyle asked about the relation
of this document to the accreditation process and to the upcoming
campaign. Associate Provost Untener
indicated that this action would not negatively impact the accreditation
process and could be viewed as on-going review for the purpose of
continuous improvement. Biers
indicated that this document was not at this point connected to the
campaign. The University Strategic
Plan, which is in the final stages of formulation and which should go to
the Board of Trustees in October, is what will guide the campaign.
- Senator Biers indicated that three other issues, all of which
impact the lives of faculty as professionals, will be brought forward this
year. All three were the subject of
sense-of-the-Senate discussions last academic year. The Provost Committee working on a
University –wide committee on promotion and tenure processes reports that
its work is in final form and will be forwarded to the Academic
Senate. The Committee working on
the Post-tenure Review document will meet September 26 to decide the
status of its work. The Committee
working on the Evaluation of Teaching has sent the document to external
consultants who have suggested needed revisions. All three standing committees will be
involved in the review and evaluation of these documents and campus
discussions will be facilitated on the issues.
- The Faculty Affairs Committee is still working with Human
Resources concerning the issue of background checks for faculty.
- The Calendar Committee is addressing the “common sense” exam
policy proposal and will report to the Executive Committee regarding its
recommendation. In addition, a
sub-committee working on suggestions regarding the academic schedule has
floated a draft proposal to some members of the University community for
response. Senator DeMarco asked for
information about the proposal.
Senator Biers briefly described the scheduling proposals. Senator Gustafson, Chairperson of the
calendar Committee, indicated that that proposal will have to move through
the Calendar Committee for evaluation. There will be opportunity for broad
campus in-put before any proposal is brought forward. Senator Penno noted that Senate
Document 04-09 related to this issue.
- The Student Academic Policies Committee is continuing work on an
Honors Statement.
7. Senate Quickplace:
Senator Johnson reported that IT has requested that the Academic
Senate begin using a Quickplace in order to minimize the traffic of documents
delivered by e-mail. She has begun to
organize the site and introduced Senators to it. She requested that the Standing Committees
send her requests for structuring the rooms.
It was decided that all members of the Senate will be given reader
privileges in all rooms. Those on each
committee will be given author privileges for the room or rooms delegated to
the Committees on which they serve. She
will do some more work on the site and then notify all members.
8. Adjournment: Moved and seconded, the meeting adjourned at
3:35 PM. Standing committees used the remainder of the time for organizational
meetings.
Respectfully submitted,
Patricia A. Johnson