Kim Geron and James S. Lai
excerpted from: Kim Geron and James S. Lai, Beyond
Symbolic Representation: a Comparison of the Electoral Pathways and
Policy Priorities of Asian American and Latino Elected Officials , 9
Asian Law Journal 41- 81, 41-42, 81 (May, 2002) (109 Footnotes)
This is an exploratory study of the impact of Latino and Asian
American elected officials on their respective groups' political
incorporation. The authors argue that Latino and Asian American elected
officials' paths to elected office do not always fit the biracial
coalition model of political incorporation for minorities, and instead
suggest a reconstructed model to explain the distinctive character of
Latino and Asian American group efforts toward political representation.
The results of this paper are based on information gathered from two
nationwide mail surveys of Latino elected officials (LEOs) and Asian
American elected officials (AAEOs). The 2000 National Asian American and
Latino Elected Officials Survey was conducted in Fall 2000 with
interviews of elected officials held in 2001. The 1999 National Asian
American Elected Officials Survey was conducted in May 1999 with
interviews of elected officials held throughout 2000. This paper focuses
on analyzing the means by which Latinos and Asian Americans have
achieved political power, their sources of community support, and the
resources they needed to successfully win office. It also examines
current Latina/o and Asian American office- holders and explores whether
they direct policy benefits to their respective communities.
The results of these surveys indicate that Latino and Asian American
politicians are on average older, more financially secure, and better
educated than their respective general populations. They also are more
liberal ideologically than the general populations. The analysis further
reveals that the percentage of ethnic population is a stronger
determinant for the election of Latino politicians than for Asian
American politicians. A significant number of LEOs aim their policies to
benefit primarily the Latino community, whereas AAEOs focus on broader
community issues due to their districts' demographics. Ethnicity,
however, can play a significant role for AAEOs, particularly in raising
campaign contributions from their communities. This paper concludes that
despite internal heterogeneity and structural barriers that have limited
both groups' political advancement, Latino and Asian American political
activists are using a variety of methods to achieve political
incorporation and policy responsiveness at the local and state levels.
. . .
This exploratory research into the electoral efforts and policy
priorities of a new cohort of ethnic elected officials finds that they
have both drawn on ethnic support to achieve elected office. A
significant number of AAEOs have relied on outside pan-ethnic funding
support to compensate for limited voting power in their non-Asian
districts. LEOs, on the other hand, have relied on family and friends,
combined with selective interest support, including unions and business
interests, to achieve electoral office. Their policy priorities reflect
their similar immigrant origins and liberal backgrounds. This paper
represents the beginning of ongoing research on historically
understudied groups of elected officials. Future research is needed to
explore the levels of political incorporation for LEOs and AAEOs and to
measure the extent of incorporation in different locations and under
different circumstances. Whether LEOs and AAEOs can become part of the
governing coalitions in urban cities beyond the level of formal
representation remains to be seen. Also, more research is needed to
explore the impact of Latino and Asian Pacific American political
incorporation on the political fortunes of African Americans, as all
these groups increasingly find themselves pitted against each other for
electoral positions in areas where they are concentrated. Furthermore,
the growth of political participation of other people of color such as
Caribbean Island immigrants, Native Americans, and people of mixed race
backgrounds will create new areas of research into the different
pathways of political incorporation.
In a society as diverse as the United States, equality for all
remains an elusive goal. In a nation where the dominant majority has
used physical and cultural differences to discriminate and to
marginalize minority groups, the need for symbolic and substantive
representation is a necessary step in a much longer process of full
equality for historically underrepresented groups. The political
representation of minority groups is exclusively the responsibility of
its members. However, the historical divisions amongst the racialized
peoples of this country require continued exploration of how minority
representatives act to represent their own historically underrepresented
group members and others in a similar situation. As Williams notes,
"Although representation for marginalized groups is not in itself a
cure for injustice, there is good reason to believe it is at least a
healing measure."
[d1]. Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science,
California State University, Hayward.
[r1]. Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science and Ethnic
Studies Program, Santa Clara University. |