When did you begin to
think that Obama might be unstoppable? Was it when your
grown feminist daughter started weeping inconsolably
over his defeat in New Hampshire? Or was it when he
triumphed in Virginia, a state still littered with
Confederate monuments and memorabilia? For me, it was on
Tuesday night when two Republican Virginians in a row
called CSPAN radio to report that they'd just voted for
Ron Paul, but, in the general election, would vote for
... Obama. In the dominant campaign narrative, his
appeal is mysterious and irrational: He's a "rock star,"
all flash and no substance, tending dangerously,
according to the New York Times' Paul Krugman,
to a "cult of personality." At best, he's seen as
another vague Reagan-esque avatar of Hallmarkian
sentiments like optimism and hope. While Clinton, the
designated valedictorian, reaches out for the ego and
super-ego, he supposedly goes for the id. She might as
well be promoting choral singing in the face of
Beatlemania.
The Clinton coterie is wringing its hands. Should she
transform herself into an economic populist, as Paul
Begala pleaded on Tuesday night? This would be a
stretch, given her technocratic and elitist approach to
health reform in 1993, her embarrassing vote for a
credit card company-supported bankruptcy bill in 2001,
among numerous other lapses. Besides, Obama already just
leaped out in front of her with a resoundingly populist
economic program on Wednesday.
Or should she reconfigure herself, untangle her
triangulations, and attempt to appeal to the American
people in some deep human way, with or without a tear or
two? This, too, would take heavy lifting. Someone needs
to tell her that there are better ways to signal
conviction than by raising one's voice and drawing out
the vowels, as in "I KNOW ..." and "I
BELIEVE ..." The frozen smile has to go too, along
with the metronymic nodding, which sometimes goes on
long enough to suggest a placement within the autism
spectrum.
But I don't think any tweakings of the candidate or
her message will work, and not because Obama-mania is an
occult force or a kind of mass hysteria. Let's take
seriously what he offers, which is "change." The promise
of "change" is what drives the Obama juggernaut, and
"change" means wanting out of wherever you are now. It
can even mean wanting out so badly that you don't much
care, as in the case of the Ron Paul voters cited above,
exactly what that change will be. In reality, there's no
mystery about the direction in which Obama might take
us: He's written a breathtakingly honest autobiography;
he has a long legislative history, and now, a meaty
economic program. But no one checks the weather before
leaping out of a burning building.
Consider our present situation. Thanks to Iraq and
water-boarding, Abu Ghraib and the "rendering" of terror
suspects, we've achieved the moral status of a pariah
nation. The seas are rising. The dollar is sinking. A
growing proportion of Americans have no access to health
care; an estimated 18,000 die every year for lack of
health insurance. Now, as the economy staggers into
recession, the financial analysts are wondering only
whether the rest of the world is sufficiently
"de-coupled" from the US economy to survive our demise.
Clinton can put forth all the policy proposals she
likes -- and many of them are admirable ones -- but
anyone can see that she's of the same generation and
even one of the same families that got us into this
checkmate situation in the first place. True, some
people miss Bill, although the nostalgia was severely
undercut by his anti-Obama rhetoric in South Carolina,
or maybe they just miss the internet bubble he happened
to preside over. But even more people find dynastic
successions distasteful, especially when it's a dynasty
that produced so little by way of concrete improvements
in our lives. Whatever she does, the semiotics of her
campaign boils down to two words -- "same old."
Obama is different, really different, and that in
itself represents "change." A Kenyan-Kansan with roots
in Indonesia and multiracial Hawaii, he seems to be the
perfect answer to the bumper sticker that says, "I love
you America, but isn't it time to start seeing other
people?" As conservative commentator Andrew Sullivan has
written, Obama's election could mean the re-branding of
America. An anti-war black president with an
Arab-sounding name: See, we're not so bad after all,
world!
So yes, there's a powerful emotional component to
Obama-mania, and not just because he's a far more
inspiring speaker than his rival. We, perhaps white
people especially, look to him for atonement and
redemption. All of us, of whatever race, want a fresh
start. That's what "change" means right now: Get us
out of here! |